Without clearing out the "accumulator" for the backtick parsing,
our control name was full of junk (the previous device name) causing
us to not correctly find the control.
Ensure that always we clear the "accumulator" string during backtick
parsing.
because
* the purpose of the emulated Wiimote state in the real Wiimote mode is to store the real Wiimote state rather than synchronise with an emulated Wiimote
This fix the 1h32 audio bug which outputs static sound after 1h32.
The mixer is used for 32->48kHz resampling and as output buffer for the async audio backends.
So this buffer was indiced by a writing and a reading pointer and the count of samples in it.
As this is redundant and the sample count isn't accurate calculateable because of the interpolation,
both indices gets out of sync. So after some time (~92min), this buffer overflows and return only garbage.
thx @ moosehunter + delroth for debugging on this issue. You did the most work :-)
when
* opening the Wiimote configuration dialog
* booting from the emulated program entry point rather than a state
because
* it doesn't have meaning in these scenarios
* it has meaning when booting from a state
Feedback is in logs as suggested by skid_au. The checkbox is still there, but
mostly for people who would like to opt out (unfortunately, I can not be sure
how this feature may behave for some routers - there's a hell of a lot of bad
UPnP implementations.)
The Visual Studio stuff is a little messy, so I apologize if anything is a bit
off. I tested most configurations and it worked.
I also tested CMake on Debian Wheezy, Ubuntu Saucy, and Mac OS X Mountain Lion.
All seemed to be OK.
Also keep a PNG version of bin2c'd resources in order to make these kind of
changes easier in the future.
Fixes recent versions of libpng complaining loudly about our images.
Otherwise, valid control names like "Cursor X+" would be incorrectly
tokenized as "`Cursor` `X` +", causing the parser to first abort trying to
find a control named `Cursor` rather than aborting with invalid syntax on
the bad binop.
We could also do this by resolving devices lazily, but since simple
control name bindings are going to be 90% of usecases, just look for these
first.
Yeah, yeah, it's possible that some guy would try to build DInput
without XInput, but they're crazy, and I doubt it would have worked
since the header file mess was so fragile anyway. Always exclude
DInput devices when we don't have XInput.
Jasper St. Pierre