Update references was failing to update the references, causing input to stay nullptr and crashing.
I fixed the case that triggered that, though also added checks against nullptrs for safety.
(cherry picked from commit 4bdcf707555a5568eddff957fa3604975ffb6ed7)
Add ! before unused variables to 'use' them.
Ubuntu-x64 emits warnings for unused variables because gcc decides
it should ignore the void cast around them. See thread for discussion:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66425
Loop index int i was being compared against GetControllerCount() which
returned a size_t. This was the only place GetControllerCount() was
called from so the change of return type doesn't disturb anything else.
Changing the loop index to size_t wouldn't work as well since it's
passed into GetController(), which takes an int and is called from many
places, so it would need a cast anyway on an already busy line.
DualShock UDP Client is the only place in the code that assumed OnConfigChanged()
is called at least once on startup or it won't load up the setting, so I took care of that
-If adding 2 devices with the same name, they their unique id wouldn't be increased, causing a conflict.
-Removing a device wouldn't actually remove it from the internal devices list because the list of devices had already been updated when going through it.
-It was possible to remove devices belonging to other sources by adding a device with the same name and then removing it.
Make sure m_is_populating_devices is true when a WM_INPUT_DEVICE_CHANGE
event is received directly on the ciface thread, so that callbacks do
not occur while removing devices. This breaks a hold-and-wait deadlock
between the ciface thread and the CPU thread when using emulated
Wiimotes.
Co-authored-by: brainleq <brainleq@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: oldmud0 <oldmud0@users.noreply.github.com>
We want to use positional arguments in translatable strings
that have more than one argument so that translators can change
the order of them, but the question is: Should we also use
positional arguments in translatable strings with only one
argument? I think it makes most sense that way, partially
so that translators don't even have to be aware of the
non-positional syntax and partially because "translatable
strings use positional arguments" is an easier rule for us
to remember than "transitional strings which have more than
one argument use positional arguments". But let me know if
you have a different opinion.
Jordan Woyak