Using GTEST_SKIP instead of just returning from the function shows that
a test was skipped in the test summary. If GTEST_SKIP is called the rest
of the function won't be run, just like with the return.
GTEST_SKIP wasn't available until gtest 1.10, and we updated to 1.12 in
597f8f1b87.
Check bytes directly to avoid ambiguity in the disassembly between short
and near jumps, which could hypothetically cause the test to pass when
it shouldn't.
Replace the bool parameter force5bytes in J, JMP, and J_CC with an enum
class Jump::Short/Near. Many callers set that parameter to the literal
'true', which was unclear if you didn't already know what it did.
Now that we've flipped the C++20 switch, let's start making use of
the nice new <bit> header.
I'm planning on handling this move away from BitUtils.h incrementally
in a series of PRs. There may be a few functions remaining in
BitUtils.h by the end that C++20 doesn't have any equivalents for.
DataReader is generally jank - it has a start and end pointer, but the end pointer is generally not used, and all of the vertex loaders mostly bypassed it anyways.
Wrapper code (the vertex loaer test, as well as Fifo.cpp and OpcodeDecoding.cpp) still uses it, as does the software vertex loader (which is not a subclass of VertexLoader). These can probably be eliminated later.
This currently fails for direct with NormalIndex3 enabled (see https://bugs.dolphin-emu.org/issues/12952). The goal of this test is to be able to confidently say that that bug has been fixed.
We have one that does a similar thing, but only to measure speed and uses indices. This one verifies accuracy (and uses the largest possible input size by using direct components).
* moves dolphin-specific settings out of Base.props
* creates exports.props for externals, allowing to easily import
individual Externals
* corrects some cruft that accumulated and probably contributed
to msbuild overbuilding
Most of these correspond to changes made in devkitPro/libogc@b1b8ecab3a.
The numeric vlaues of ACC0 and ACC1 in Dolphin are different (see b06d38389b, though I'm not sure when this difference first appeared). Technically it's not even necessary to list the registers at the start like this anymore, but old programs do it, so it seems useful to have a test that covers it.
The binary itself does not need to be changed; the warnings were simply stating that "although you wrote $ACL0, the generated binary instead is using $ACC0" or similar; by changing the code to use $ACC0 directly the warnings are resolved.
Admiral H. Curtiss