Selecting Dummy or Memory Card would pass wrong values to EXI::ChangeDevice and not work as expected
Changing path had no effect until device was changed as it didn't call EXI::ChangeDevice at all
Makes the enum values strongly-typed and prevents the identifiers from
polluting the PowerPC namespace. This also cleans up the parameters of
some functions where we were accepting an ambiguous int type and
expecting the correct values to be passed in.
Now those parameters accept a PowerPC::CPUCore type only, making it
immediately obvious which values should be passed in. It also turns out
we were storing these core types into other structures as plain ints,
which have also been corrected.
As this type is used directly with the configuration code, we need to
provide our own overloaded insertion (<<) and extraction (>>) operators
in order to make it compatible with it. These are fairly trivial to
implement, so there's no issue here.
A minor adjustment to TryParse() was required, as our generic function
was doing the following:
N tmp = 0;
which is problematic, as custom types may not be able to have that
assignment performed (e.g. strongly-typed enums), so we change this to:
N tmp;
which is sufficient, as the value is attempted to be initialized
immediately under that statement.
This ports the Wii filesystem root, Wii SD card path and dump path
settings to the new config system (OnionConfig).
My initial plan was to wait until DolphinWX was removed before porting
most of the Main (Core, DSP, General) settings to onion config, but
I've decided to submit a small part of those changes to fix
[issue 10566](https://bugs.dolphin-emu.org/issues/10566).
Removes the need to manually set the FileUtil path in the UI frontends
and gets rid of some more members that don't really belong in SConfig.
Also fixes a bug which would cause the dump path not to get created
after change.
Without this macro, if any signals or slots were attempted to be used,
they wouldn't work; neither would various other features of the Qt
meta-object system. This can also lead to weird behavior in other
circumstances. Qt's documentation specifically states:
"Therefore, we strongly recommend that all subclasses of QObject use the
Q_OBJECT macro regardless of whether or not they actually use signals,
slots, and properties."
on its page for "The Meta-Object System", which can be seen here:
https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/metaobjects.html
Let's opt for "always do the right thing", and keep the code extensible
for the future and not have random things blow up on us.
Techjar