dolphin/Source/Core/VideoCommon/OpcodeDecoding.cpp

269 lines
7.1 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

// Copyright 2008 Dolphin Emulator Project
2015-05-17 23:08:10 +00:00
// Licensed under GPLv2+
// Refer to the license.txt file included.
// DL facts:
// Ikaruga uses (nearly) NO display lists!
// Zelda WW uses TONS of display lists
// Zelda TP uses almost 100% display lists except menus (we like this!)
// Super Mario Galaxy has nearly all geometry and more than half of the state in DLs (great!)
// Note that it IS NOT GENERALLY POSSIBLE to precompile display lists! You can compile them as they
// are
// while interpreting them, and hope that the vertex format doesn't change, though, if you do it
// right
// when they are called. The reason is that the vertex format affects the sizes of the vertices.
#include "VideoCommon/OpcodeDecoding.h"
#include "Common/CommonTypes.h"
#include "Common/Logging/Log.h"
#include "Common/MsgHandler.h"
#include "Core/FifoPlayer/FifoRecorder.h"
#include "Core/HW/Memmap.h"
#include "VideoCommon/BPMemory.h"
#include "VideoCommon/CPMemory.h"
#include "VideoCommon/CommandProcessor.h"
#include "VideoCommon/DataReader.h"
#include "VideoCommon/Fifo.h"
#include "VideoCommon/Statistics.h"
#include "VideoCommon/VertexLoaderManager.h"
#include "VideoCommon/VideoCommon.h"
#include "VideoCommon/XFMemory.h"
bool g_bRecordFifoData = false;
2016-01-24 06:29:44 +00:00
namespace OpcodeDecoder
{
2015-03-16 09:56:16 +00:00
static bool s_bFifoErrorSeen = false;
Refactor opcode decoding a bit to kill FifoCommandRunnable. Separated out from my gpu-determinism branch by request. It's not a big commit; I just like to write long commit messages. The main reason to kill it is hopefully a slight performance improvement from avoiding the double switch (especially in single core mode); however, this also improves cycle calculation, as described below. - FifoCommandRunnable is removed; in its stead, Decode returns the number of cycles (which only matters for "sync" GPU mode), or 0 if there was not enough data, and is also responsible for unknown opcode alerts. Decode and DecodeSemiNop are almost identical, so the latter is replaced with a skipped_frame parameter to Decode. Doesn't mean we can't improve skipped_frame mode to do less work; if, at such a point, branching on it has too much overhead (it certainly won't now), it can always be changed to a template parameter. - FifoCommandRunnable used a fixed, large cycle count for display lists, regardless of the contents. Presumably the actual hardware's processing time is mostly the processing time of whatever commands are in the list, and with this change InterpretDisplayList can just return the list's cycle count to be added to the total. (Since the calculation for this is part of Decode, it didn't seem easy to split this change up.) To facilitate this, Decode also gains an explicit 'end' parameter in lieu of FifoCommandRunnable's call to GetVideoBufferEndPtr, which can point to there or to the end of a display list (or elsewhere in gpu-determinism, but that's another story). Also, as a small optimization, InterpretDisplayList now calls OpcodeDecoder_Run rather than having its own Decode loop, to allow Decode to be inlined (haven't checked whether this actually happens though). skipped_frame mode still does not traverse display lists and uses the old fake value of 45 cycles. degasus has suggested that this hack is not essential for performance and can be removed, but I want to separate any potential performance impact of that from this commit.
2014-09-01 05:11:32 +00:00
static u32 InterpretDisplayList(u32 address, u32 size)
{
u8* startAddress;
Add the 'desynced GPU thread' mode. It's a relatively big commit (less big with -w), but it's hard to test any of this separately... The basic problem is that in netplay or movies, the state of the CPU must be deterministic, including when the game receives notification that the GPU has processed FIFO data. Dual core mode notifies the game whenever the GPU thread actually gets around to doing the work, so it isn't deterministic. Single core mode is because it notifies the game 'instantly' (after processing the data synchronously), but it's too slow for many systems and games. My old dc-netplay branch worked as follows: everything worked as normal except the state of the CP registers was a lie, and the CPU thread only delivered results when idle detection triggered (waiting for the GPU if they weren't ready at that point). Usually, a game is idle iff all the work for the frame has been done, except for a small amount of work depending on the GPU result, so neither the CPU or the GPU waiting on the other affected performance much. However, it's possible that the game could be waiting for some earlier interrupt, and any of several games which, for whatever reason, never went into a detectable idle (even when I tried to improve the detection) would never receive results at all. (The current method should have better compatibility, but it also has slightly higher overhead and breaks some other things, so I want to reimplement this, hopefully with less impact on the code, in the future.) With this commit, the basic idea is that the CPU thread acts as if the work has been done instantly, like single core mode, but actually hands it off asynchronously to the GPU thread (after backing up some data that the game might change in memory before it's actually done). Since the work isn't done, any feedback from the GPU to the CPU, such as real XFB/EFB copies (virtual are OK), EFB pokes, performance queries, etc. is broken; but most games work with these options disabled, and there is no need to try to detect what the CPU thread is doing. Technically: when the flag g_use_deterministic_gpu_thread (currently stuck on) is on, the CPU thread calls RunGpu like in single core mode. This function synchronously copies the data from the FIFO to the internal video buffer and updates the CP registers, interrupts, etc. However, instead of the regular ReadDataFromFifo followed by running the opcode decoder, it runs ReadDataFromFifoOnCPU -> OpcodeDecoder_Preprocess, which relatively quickly scans through the FIFO data, detects SetFinish calls etc., which are immediately fired, and saves certain associated data from memory (e.g. display lists) in AuxBuffers (a parallel stream to the main FIFO, which is a bit slow at the moment), before handing the data off to the GPU thread to actually render. That makes up the bulk of this commit. In various circumstances, including the aforementioned EFB pokes and performance queries as well as swap requests (i.e. the end of a frame - we don't want the CPU potentially pumping out frames too quickly and the GPU falling behind*), SyncGPU is called to wait for actual completion. The overhead mainly comes from OpcodeDecoder_Preprocess (which is, again, synchronous), as well as the actual copying. Currently, display lists and such are escrowed from main memory even though they usually won't change over the course of a frame, and textures are not even though they might, resulting in a small chance of graphical glitches. When the texture locking (i.e. fault on write) code lands, I can make this all correct and maybe a little faster. * This suggests an alternate determinism method of just delaying results until a short time before the end of each frame. For all I know this might mostly work - I haven't tried it - but if any significant work hinges on the competion of render to texture etc., the frame will be missed.
2014-08-28 02:56:19 +00:00
if (Fifo::UseDeterministicGPUThread())
startAddress = (u8*)Fifo::PopFifoAuxBuffer(size);
else
startAddress = Memory::GetPointer(address);
u32 cycles = 0;
Refactor opcode decoding a bit to kill FifoCommandRunnable. Separated out from my gpu-determinism branch by request. It's not a big commit; I just like to write long commit messages. The main reason to kill it is hopefully a slight performance improvement from avoiding the double switch (especially in single core mode); however, this also improves cycle calculation, as described below. - FifoCommandRunnable is removed; in its stead, Decode returns the number of cycles (which only matters for "sync" GPU mode), or 0 if there was not enough data, and is also responsible for unknown opcode alerts. Decode and DecodeSemiNop are almost identical, so the latter is replaced with a skipped_frame parameter to Decode. Doesn't mean we can't improve skipped_frame mode to do less work; if, at such a point, branching on it has too much overhead (it certainly won't now), it can always be changed to a template parameter. - FifoCommandRunnable used a fixed, large cycle count for display lists, regardless of the contents. Presumably the actual hardware's processing time is mostly the processing time of whatever commands are in the list, and with this change InterpretDisplayList can just return the list's cycle count to be added to the total. (Since the calculation for this is part of Decode, it didn't seem easy to split this change up.) To facilitate this, Decode also gains an explicit 'end' parameter in lieu of FifoCommandRunnable's call to GetVideoBufferEndPtr, which can point to there or to the end of a display list (or elsewhere in gpu-determinism, but that's another story). Also, as a small optimization, InterpretDisplayList now calls OpcodeDecoder_Run rather than having its own Decode loop, to allow Decode to be inlined (haven't checked whether this actually happens though). skipped_frame mode still does not traverse display lists and uses the old fake value of 45 cycles. degasus has suggested that this hack is not essential for performance and can be removed, but I want to separate any potential performance impact of that from this commit.
2014-09-01 05:11:32 +00:00
// Avoid the crash if Memory::GetPointer failed ..
if (startAddress != nullptr)
{
// temporarily swap dl and non-dl (small "hack" for the stats)
Statistics::SwapDL();
Run(DataReader(startAddress, startAddress + size), &cycles, true);
INCSTAT(stats.thisFrame.numDListsCalled);
// un-swap
Statistics::SwapDL();
}
return cycles;
}
Add the 'desynced GPU thread' mode. It's a relatively big commit (less big with -w), but it's hard to test any of this separately... The basic problem is that in netplay or movies, the state of the CPU must be deterministic, including when the game receives notification that the GPU has processed FIFO data. Dual core mode notifies the game whenever the GPU thread actually gets around to doing the work, so it isn't deterministic. Single core mode is because it notifies the game 'instantly' (after processing the data synchronously), but it's too slow for many systems and games. My old dc-netplay branch worked as follows: everything worked as normal except the state of the CP registers was a lie, and the CPU thread only delivered results when idle detection triggered (waiting for the GPU if they weren't ready at that point). Usually, a game is idle iff all the work for the frame has been done, except for a small amount of work depending on the GPU result, so neither the CPU or the GPU waiting on the other affected performance much. However, it's possible that the game could be waiting for some earlier interrupt, and any of several games which, for whatever reason, never went into a detectable idle (even when I tried to improve the detection) would never receive results at all. (The current method should have better compatibility, but it also has slightly higher overhead and breaks some other things, so I want to reimplement this, hopefully with less impact on the code, in the future.) With this commit, the basic idea is that the CPU thread acts as if the work has been done instantly, like single core mode, but actually hands it off asynchronously to the GPU thread (after backing up some data that the game might change in memory before it's actually done). Since the work isn't done, any feedback from the GPU to the CPU, such as real XFB/EFB copies (virtual are OK), EFB pokes, performance queries, etc. is broken; but most games work with these options disabled, and there is no need to try to detect what the CPU thread is doing. Technically: when the flag g_use_deterministic_gpu_thread (currently stuck on) is on, the CPU thread calls RunGpu like in single core mode. This function synchronously copies the data from the FIFO to the internal video buffer and updates the CP registers, interrupts, etc. However, instead of the regular ReadDataFromFifo followed by running the opcode decoder, it runs ReadDataFromFifoOnCPU -> OpcodeDecoder_Preprocess, which relatively quickly scans through the FIFO data, detects SetFinish calls etc., which are immediately fired, and saves certain associated data from memory (e.g. display lists) in AuxBuffers (a parallel stream to the main FIFO, which is a bit slow at the moment), before handing the data off to the GPU thread to actually render. That makes up the bulk of this commit. In various circumstances, including the aforementioned EFB pokes and performance queries as well as swap requests (i.e. the end of a frame - we don't want the CPU potentially pumping out frames too quickly and the GPU falling behind*), SyncGPU is called to wait for actual completion. The overhead mainly comes from OpcodeDecoder_Preprocess (which is, again, synchronous), as well as the actual copying. Currently, display lists and such are escrowed from main memory even though they usually won't change over the course of a frame, and textures are not even though they might, resulting in a small chance of graphical glitches. When the texture locking (i.e. fault on write) code lands, I can make this all correct and maybe a little faster. * This suggests an alternate determinism method of just delaying results until a short time before the end of each frame. For all I know this might mostly work - I haven't tried it - but if any significant work hinges on the competion of render to texture etc., the frame will be missed.
2014-08-28 02:56:19 +00:00
static void InterpretDisplayListPreprocess(u32 address, u32 size)
{
u8* startAddress = Memory::GetPointer(address);
Add the 'desynced GPU thread' mode. It's a relatively big commit (less big with -w), but it's hard to test any of this separately... The basic problem is that in netplay or movies, the state of the CPU must be deterministic, including when the game receives notification that the GPU has processed FIFO data. Dual core mode notifies the game whenever the GPU thread actually gets around to doing the work, so it isn't deterministic. Single core mode is because it notifies the game 'instantly' (after processing the data synchronously), but it's too slow for many systems and games. My old dc-netplay branch worked as follows: everything worked as normal except the state of the CP registers was a lie, and the CPU thread only delivered results when idle detection triggered (waiting for the GPU if they weren't ready at that point). Usually, a game is idle iff all the work for the frame has been done, except for a small amount of work depending on the GPU result, so neither the CPU or the GPU waiting on the other affected performance much. However, it's possible that the game could be waiting for some earlier interrupt, and any of several games which, for whatever reason, never went into a detectable idle (even when I tried to improve the detection) would never receive results at all. (The current method should have better compatibility, but it also has slightly higher overhead and breaks some other things, so I want to reimplement this, hopefully with less impact on the code, in the future.) With this commit, the basic idea is that the CPU thread acts as if the work has been done instantly, like single core mode, but actually hands it off asynchronously to the GPU thread (after backing up some data that the game might change in memory before it's actually done). Since the work isn't done, any feedback from the GPU to the CPU, such as real XFB/EFB copies (virtual are OK), EFB pokes, performance queries, etc. is broken; but most games work with these options disabled, and there is no need to try to detect what the CPU thread is doing. Technically: when the flag g_use_deterministic_gpu_thread (currently stuck on) is on, the CPU thread calls RunGpu like in single core mode. This function synchronously copies the data from the FIFO to the internal video buffer and updates the CP registers, interrupts, etc. However, instead of the regular ReadDataFromFifo followed by running the opcode decoder, it runs ReadDataFromFifoOnCPU -> OpcodeDecoder_Preprocess, which relatively quickly scans through the FIFO data, detects SetFinish calls etc., which are immediately fired, and saves certain associated data from memory (e.g. display lists) in AuxBuffers (a parallel stream to the main FIFO, which is a bit slow at the moment), before handing the data off to the GPU thread to actually render. That makes up the bulk of this commit. In various circumstances, including the aforementioned EFB pokes and performance queries as well as swap requests (i.e. the end of a frame - we don't want the CPU potentially pumping out frames too quickly and the GPU falling behind*), SyncGPU is called to wait for actual completion. The overhead mainly comes from OpcodeDecoder_Preprocess (which is, again, synchronous), as well as the actual copying. Currently, display lists and such are escrowed from main memory even though they usually won't change over the course of a frame, and textures are not even though they might, resulting in a small chance of graphical glitches. When the texture locking (i.e. fault on write) code lands, I can make this all correct and maybe a little faster. * This suggests an alternate determinism method of just delaying results until a short time before the end of each frame. For all I know this might mostly work - I haven't tried it - but if any significant work hinges on the competion of render to texture etc., the frame will be missed.
2014-08-28 02:56:19 +00:00
Fifo::PushFifoAuxBuffer(startAddress, size);
Add the 'desynced GPU thread' mode. It's a relatively big commit (less big with -w), but it's hard to test any of this separately... The basic problem is that in netplay or movies, the state of the CPU must be deterministic, including when the game receives notification that the GPU has processed FIFO data. Dual core mode notifies the game whenever the GPU thread actually gets around to doing the work, so it isn't deterministic. Single core mode is because it notifies the game 'instantly' (after processing the data synchronously), but it's too slow for many systems and games. My old dc-netplay branch worked as follows: everything worked as normal except the state of the CP registers was a lie, and the CPU thread only delivered results when idle detection triggered (waiting for the GPU if they weren't ready at that point). Usually, a game is idle iff all the work for the frame has been done, except for a small amount of work depending on the GPU result, so neither the CPU or the GPU waiting on the other affected performance much. However, it's possible that the game could be waiting for some earlier interrupt, and any of several games which, for whatever reason, never went into a detectable idle (even when I tried to improve the detection) would never receive results at all. (The current method should have better compatibility, but it also has slightly higher overhead and breaks some other things, so I want to reimplement this, hopefully with less impact on the code, in the future.) With this commit, the basic idea is that the CPU thread acts as if the work has been done instantly, like single core mode, but actually hands it off asynchronously to the GPU thread (after backing up some data that the game might change in memory before it's actually done). Since the work isn't done, any feedback from the GPU to the CPU, such as real XFB/EFB copies (virtual are OK), EFB pokes, performance queries, etc. is broken; but most games work with these options disabled, and there is no need to try to detect what the CPU thread is doing. Technically: when the flag g_use_deterministic_gpu_thread (currently stuck on) is on, the CPU thread calls RunGpu like in single core mode. This function synchronously copies the data from the FIFO to the internal video buffer and updates the CP registers, interrupts, etc. However, instead of the regular ReadDataFromFifo followed by running the opcode decoder, it runs ReadDataFromFifoOnCPU -> OpcodeDecoder_Preprocess, which relatively quickly scans through the FIFO data, detects SetFinish calls etc., which are immediately fired, and saves certain associated data from memory (e.g. display lists) in AuxBuffers (a parallel stream to the main FIFO, which is a bit slow at the moment), before handing the data off to the GPU thread to actually render. That makes up the bulk of this commit. In various circumstances, including the aforementioned EFB pokes and performance queries as well as swap requests (i.e. the end of a frame - we don't want the CPU potentially pumping out frames too quickly and the GPU falling behind*), SyncGPU is called to wait for actual completion. The overhead mainly comes from OpcodeDecoder_Preprocess (which is, again, synchronous), as well as the actual copying. Currently, display lists and such are escrowed from main memory even though they usually won't change over the course of a frame, and textures are not even though they might, resulting in a small chance of graphical glitches. When the texture locking (i.e. fault on write) code lands, I can make this all correct and maybe a little faster. * This suggests an alternate determinism method of just delaying results until a short time before the end of each frame. For all I know this might mostly work - I haven't tried it - but if any significant work hinges on the competion of render to texture etc., the frame will be missed.
2014-08-28 02:56:19 +00:00
if (startAddress != nullptr)
{
Run<true>(DataReader(startAddress, startAddress + size), nullptr, true);
}
Add the 'desynced GPU thread' mode. It's a relatively big commit (less big with -w), but it's hard to test any of this separately... The basic problem is that in netplay or movies, the state of the CPU must be deterministic, including when the game receives notification that the GPU has processed FIFO data. Dual core mode notifies the game whenever the GPU thread actually gets around to doing the work, so it isn't deterministic. Single core mode is because it notifies the game 'instantly' (after processing the data synchronously), but it's too slow for many systems and games. My old dc-netplay branch worked as follows: everything worked as normal except the state of the CP registers was a lie, and the CPU thread only delivered results when idle detection triggered (waiting for the GPU if they weren't ready at that point). Usually, a game is idle iff all the work for the frame has been done, except for a small amount of work depending on the GPU result, so neither the CPU or the GPU waiting on the other affected performance much. However, it's possible that the game could be waiting for some earlier interrupt, and any of several games which, for whatever reason, never went into a detectable idle (even when I tried to improve the detection) would never receive results at all. (The current method should have better compatibility, but it also has slightly higher overhead and breaks some other things, so I want to reimplement this, hopefully with less impact on the code, in the future.) With this commit, the basic idea is that the CPU thread acts as if the work has been done instantly, like single core mode, but actually hands it off asynchronously to the GPU thread (after backing up some data that the game might change in memory before it's actually done). Since the work isn't done, any feedback from the GPU to the CPU, such as real XFB/EFB copies (virtual are OK), EFB pokes, performance queries, etc. is broken; but most games work with these options disabled, and there is no need to try to detect what the CPU thread is doing. Technically: when the flag g_use_deterministic_gpu_thread (currently stuck on) is on, the CPU thread calls RunGpu like in single core mode. This function synchronously copies the data from the FIFO to the internal video buffer and updates the CP registers, interrupts, etc. However, instead of the regular ReadDataFromFifo followed by running the opcode decoder, it runs ReadDataFromFifoOnCPU -> OpcodeDecoder_Preprocess, which relatively quickly scans through the FIFO data, detects SetFinish calls etc., which are immediately fired, and saves certain associated data from memory (e.g. display lists) in AuxBuffers (a parallel stream to the main FIFO, which is a bit slow at the moment), before handing the data off to the GPU thread to actually render. That makes up the bulk of this commit. In various circumstances, including the aforementioned EFB pokes and performance queries as well as swap requests (i.e. the end of a frame - we don't want the CPU potentially pumping out frames too quickly and the GPU falling behind*), SyncGPU is called to wait for actual completion. The overhead mainly comes from OpcodeDecoder_Preprocess (which is, again, synchronous), as well as the actual copying. Currently, display lists and such are escrowed from main memory even though they usually won't change over the course of a frame, and textures are not even though they might, resulting in a small chance of graphical glitches. When the texture locking (i.e. fault on write) code lands, I can make this all correct and maybe a little faster. * This suggests an alternate determinism method of just delaying results until a short time before the end of each frame. For all I know this might mostly work - I haven't tried it - but if any significant work hinges on the competion of render to texture etc., the frame will be missed.
2014-08-28 02:56:19 +00:00
}
2016-01-24 06:29:44 +00:00
void Init()
2014-11-27 22:53:11 +00:00
{
s_bFifoErrorSeen = false;
2014-11-27 22:53:11 +00:00
}
template <bool is_preprocess>
2016-01-24 06:29:44 +00:00
u8* Run(DataReader src, u32* cycles, bool in_display_list)
{
u32 totalCycles = 0;
u8* opcodeStart;
while (true)
{
opcodeStart = src.GetPointer();
if (!src.size())
goto end;
u8 cmd_byte = src.Read<u8>();
int refarray;
switch (cmd_byte)
{
case GX_NOP:
totalCycles += 6; // Hm, this means that we scan over nop streams pretty slowly...
break;
case GX_UNKNOWN_RESET:
totalCycles += 6; // Datel software uses this command
DEBUG_LOG(VIDEO, "GX Reset?: %08x", cmd_byte);
break;
case GX_LOAD_CP_REG:
{
if (src.size() < 1 + 4)
goto end;
totalCycles += 12;
u8 sub_cmd = src.Read<u8>();
u32 value = src.Read<u32>();
LoadCPReg(sub_cmd, value, is_preprocess);
if (!is_preprocess)
INCSTAT(stats.thisFrame.numCPLoads);
}
break;
case GX_LOAD_XF_REG:
{
if (src.size() < 4)
goto end;
u32 Cmd2 = src.Read<u32>();
int transfer_size = ((Cmd2 >> 16) & 15) + 1;
if (src.size() < transfer_size * sizeof(u32))
goto end;
totalCycles += 18 + 6 * transfer_size;
if (!is_preprocess)
{
u32 xf_address = Cmd2 & 0xFFFF;
LoadXFReg(transfer_size, xf_address, src);
INCSTAT(stats.thisFrame.numXFLoads);
}
src.Skip<u32>(transfer_size);
}
break;
case GX_LOAD_INDX_A: // used for position matrices
refarray = 0xC;
goto load_indx;
case GX_LOAD_INDX_B: // used for normal matrices
refarray = 0xD;
goto load_indx;
case GX_LOAD_INDX_C: // used for postmatrices
refarray = 0xE;
goto load_indx;
case GX_LOAD_INDX_D: // used for lights
refarray = 0xF;
goto load_indx;
load_indx:
if (src.size() < 4)
goto end;
totalCycles += 6;
if (is_preprocess)
PreprocessIndexedXF(src.Read<u32>(), refarray);
else
LoadIndexedXF(src.Read<u32>(), refarray);
break;
case GX_CMD_CALL_DL:
{
if (src.size() < 8)
goto end;
u32 address = src.Read<u32>();
u32 count = src.Read<u32>();
if (in_display_list)
{
totalCycles += 6;
INFO_LOG(VIDEO, "recursive display list detected");
}
else
{
if (is_preprocess)
InterpretDisplayListPreprocess(address, count);
else
totalCycles += 6 + InterpretDisplayList(address, count);
}
}
break;
case GX_CMD_UNKNOWN_METRICS: // zelda 4 swords calls it and checks the metrics registers after
// that
totalCycles += 6;
DEBUG_LOG(VIDEO, "GX 0x44: %08x", cmd_byte);
break;
case GX_CMD_INVL_VC: // Invalidate Vertex Cache
totalCycles += 6;
DEBUG_LOG(VIDEO, "Invalidate (vertex cache?)");
break;
case GX_LOAD_BP_REG:
// In skipped_frame case: We have to let BP writes through because they set
// tokens and stuff. TODO: Call a much simplified LoadBPReg instead.
{
if (src.size() < 4)
goto end;
totalCycles += 12;
u32 bp_cmd = src.Read<u32>();
if (is_preprocess)
{
LoadBPRegPreprocess(bp_cmd);
}
else
{
LoadBPReg(bp_cmd);
INCSTAT(stats.thisFrame.numBPLoads);
}
}
break;
// draw primitives
default:
if ((cmd_byte & 0xC0) == 0x80)
{
// load vertices
if (src.size() < 2)
goto end;
u16 num_vertices = src.Read<u16>();
int bytes = VertexLoaderManager::RunVertices(
cmd_byte & GX_VAT_MASK, // Vertex loader index (0 - 7)
2016-10-08 02:55:47 +00:00
(cmd_byte & GX_PRIMITIVE_MASK) >> GX_PRIMITIVE_SHIFT, num_vertices, src, is_preprocess);
if (bytes < 0)
goto end;
src.Skip(bytes);
// 4 GPU ticks per vertex, 3 CPU ticks per GPU tick
totalCycles += num_vertices * 4 * 3 + 6;
}
else
{
if (!s_bFifoErrorSeen)
CommandProcessor::HandleUnknownOpcode(cmd_byte, opcodeStart, is_preprocess);
ERROR_LOG(VIDEO, "FIFO: Unknown Opcode(0x%02x @ %p, preprocessing = %s)", cmd_byte,
opcodeStart, is_preprocess ? "yes" : "no");
s_bFifoErrorSeen = true;
totalCycles += 1;
}
break;
}
// Display lists get added directly into the FIFO stream
if (!is_preprocess && g_bRecordFifoData && cmd_byte != GX_CMD_CALL_DL)
{
u8* opcodeEnd;
opcodeEnd = src.GetPointer();
FifoRecorder::GetInstance().WriteGPCommand(opcodeStart, u32(opcodeEnd - opcodeStart));
}
}
2014-11-27 22:53:11 +00:00
end:
if (cycles)
{
*cycles = totalCycles;
}
return opcodeStart;
}
Add the 'desynced GPU thread' mode. It's a relatively big commit (less big with -w), but it's hard to test any of this separately... The basic problem is that in netplay or movies, the state of the CPU must be deterministic, including when the game receives notification that the GPU has processed FIFO data. Dual core mode notifies the game whenever the GPU thread actually gets around to doing the work, so it isn't deterministic. Single core mode is because it notifies the game 'instantly' (after processing the data synchronously), but it's too slow for many systems and games. My old dc-netplay branch worked as follows: everything worked as normal except the state of the CP registers was a lie, and the CPU thread only delivered results when idle detection triggered (waiting for the GPU if they weren't ready at that point). Usually, a game is idle iff all the work for the frame has been done, except for a small amount of work depending on the GPU result, so neither the CPU or the GPU waiting on the other affected performance much. However, it's possible that the game could be waiting for some earlier interrupt, and any of several games which, for whatever reason, never went into a detectable idle (even when I tried to improve the detection) would never receive results at all. (The current method should have better compatibility, but it also has slightly higher overhead and breaks some other things, so I want to reimplement this, hopefully with less impact on the code, in the future.) With this commit, the basic idea is that the CPU thread acts as if the work has been done instantly, like single core mode, but actually hands it off asynchronously to the GPU thread (after backing up some data that the game might change in memory before it's actually done). Since the work isn't done, any feedback from the GPU to the CPU, such as real XFB/EFB copies (virtual are OK), EFB pokes, performance queries, etc. is broken; but most games work with these options disabled, and there is no need to try to detect what the CPU thread is doing. Technically: when the flag g_use_deterministic_gpu_thread (currently stuck on) is on, the CPU thread calls RunGpu like in single core mode. This function synchronously copies the data from the FIFO to the internal video buffer and updates the CP registers, interrupts, etc. However, instead of the regular ReadDataFromFifo followed by running the opcode decoder, it runs ReadDataFromFifoOnCPU -> OpcodeDecoder_Preprocess, which relatively quickly scans through the FIFO data, detects SetFinish calls etc., which are immediately fired, and saves certain associated data from memory (e.g. display lists) in AuxBuffers (a parallel stream to the main FIFO, which is a bit slow at the moment), before handing the data off to the GPU thread to actually render. That makes up the bulk of this commit. In various circumstances, including the aforementioned EFB pokes and performance queries as well as swap requests (i.e. the end of a frame - we don't want the CPU potentially pumping out frames too quickly and the GPU falling behind*), SyncGPU is called to wait for actual completion. The overhead mainly comes from OpcodeDecoder_Preprocess (which is, again, synchronous), as well as the actual copying. Currently, display lists and such are escrowed from main memory even though they usually won't change over the course of a frame, and textures are not even though they might, resulting in a small chance of graphical glitches. When the texture locking (i.e. fault on write) code lands, I can make this all correct and maybe a little faster. * This suggests an alternate determinism method of just delaying results until a short time before the end of each frame. For all I know this might mostly work - I haven't tried it - but if any significant work hinges on the competion of render to texture etc., the frame will be missed.
2014-08-28 02:56:19 +00:00
2016-01-24 06:29:44 +00:00
template u8* Run<true>(DataReader src, u32* cycles, bool in_display_list);
template u8* Run<false>(DataReader src, u32* cycles, bool in_display_list);
} // namespace OpcodeDecoder