Disable -Wstringop-truncation warnings as they result in many false
positives.
In most (all?) cases where std::strncpy is used, we want to fill the
entire buffer or match emulated code that also ignores the null
terminator, so the warnings are not useful.
Given that Dolphin itself mostly uses std::string, they do not
really help catch any bugs.
Having extra warnings enabled for everything including external
libraries produces an overwhelming amount of warnings in code that
isn't even part of our codebase.
Move the various warning flags to Source/CMakeLists.txt to get rid
of those useless warnings.
Note that the Source CMakeLists.txt is already where the MSVC warnings
are defined, so this commit improves consistency as well.
PR #9260 made the MsgAlert macros use lambdas so that local
constexpr variables can be added while keeping the ability to
return a boolean from the macros.
Unfortunately, C++17 forbids referring to structured bindings in lambda
captures. This is fixed in P1091R3 but we cannot rely on C++20 yet...
In CreateDescriptorSetLayouts(), one less dynamic binding is created when
bSupportsGeometryShaders=false. Reduce the dynamicOffsetCount argument by
one in that case. Avoids this validation error:
Attempting to bind 3 descriptorSets with 2 dynamic descriptors, but
dynamicOffsetCount is 3. It should exactly match the number of dynamic
descriptors. The Vulkan spec states: dynamicOffsetCount must be equal to
the total number of dynamic descriptors in pDescriptorSets
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Marek <jonathan@marek.ca>
[Applied clang-format]
Signed-off-by: Léo Lam <leo@leolam.fr>
Unfortunately, {fmt} allows passing too many arguments to a format call
without raising any runtime or compile-time error [1].
As this is a common source of bugs since we started migrating to {fmt},
this commit adds some custom logic to validate the number of
replacement fields in format strings in addition to {fmt}'s own checks.
[1] https://github.com/fmtlib/fmt/issues/492
We want to use positional arguments in translatable strings
that have more than one argument so that translators can change
the order of them, but the question is: Should we also use
positional arguments in translatable strings with only one
argument? I think it makes most sense that way, partially
so that translators don't even have to be aware of the
non-positional syntax and partially because "translatable
strings use positional arguments" is an easier rule for us
to remember than "transitional strings which have more than
one argument use positional arguments". But let me know if
you have a different opinion.
tr calls with more than one argument would have a 0x04 byte
in the returned string when no translation was found
(which always is the case when using Dolphin in English).
Léo Lam