The main reason why I'm adding this isn't actually to allow
users to swipe down to refresh, it's to add a loading indicator.
Considering that the Storage Access Framework can be slow for
folders with many items (many subfolders?), not showing a
loading indicator might give users the impression that adding
a folder resulted in nothing happening even though Dolphin is
scanning for games in the background. But I suppose letting
users swipe down to refresh is a nice bonus with the change.
This was caused, because we were saving the `break_on_hit` flag with the letter `p`. Then while loading the breakpoints, we read the flag with the letter `b`, resulting in the `break_on_hit` flag being always false
Filesystem accesses aren't magically faster when they are done by ES,
so this commit changes our content wrapper IPC commands to take FS
access times and read operations into account.
This should make content read timings a lot more accurate and closer
to console. Note that the accuracy of the timings are limited to the
accuracy of the emulated FS timings, and currently performance
differences between IOS9-IOS28 and newer IOS versions are not emulated.
Part 1 of fixing https://bugs.dolphin-emu.org/issues/11346
(part 2 will involve emulating those differences)
This makes it more convenient to emulate timings for IPC commands that
perform internal IOS <-> IOS IPC, for example ES relying on FS
for filesystem access.
According to hwtests, older versions of IOS are slower at performing
various filesystem operations:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1OKo9IUuKCrniz4m0kYIaMP_qFtOCmAzHZ_zAmobvBcc/edit
(courtesy of JMC)
A quick glance at IOS9 reveals that older versions of IOS have a
simplistic implementation of memcpy that does not optimize large copies
by copying 16 bytes or 32 bytes per chunk, which makes cached reads
and writes noticeably slower -- the difference was significant enough
that the OoT speedrunning community noticed that IOS9 (the IOS that
is used for the OoT VC title) was slower.
More or less a complete rewrite of the function which aims
to be equally good or better for each given input, without
relying on special cases like the old implementation did.
In particular, we now have more extensive support for
MOVN, as mentioned in a TODO comment.
Instead of constructing IPCCommandResult with static member functions
in the Device class, we can just add the relevant constructors to the
reply struct itself. Makes more sense than putting it in Device
when the struct is used in the kernel code and doesn't use any Device
specific members...
This commit also changes the IPC command handlers to return an optional
IPCCommandResult rather than an IPCCommandResult. This removes the need
for a separate boolean that indicates whether the "result" is actually
a reply, and also avoids the need to set dummy result values and ticks.
It also makes it really obvious which commands can result in no reply
being generated.
Finally, this commit renames IPCCommandResult to IPCReply since the
struct is now only used for actual replies. This new name is less
verbose in my opinion.
The diff is quite large since this touches every command handler, but
the only functional change is that I fixed EnqueueIPCReply to
take a s64 for cycles_in_future to match IPCReply.
Sepalani