This reverts the effects of commit 4afeffc857 ("blockjob: do not allow
coroutine double entry or entry-after-completion", 2017-11-21)
This fixed the symptom of a bug rather than the root cause. Canceling the
wait on a sleeping blockjob coroutine is generally fine, we just need to
make it work correctly across AioContexts. To do so, use a QEMUTimer
that calls block_job_enter. Use a mutex to ensure that block_job_enter
synchronizes correctly with block_job_sleep_ns.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Tested-By: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
All callers are using QEMU_CLOCK_REALTIME, and it will not be possible to
support more than one clock when block_job_sleep_ns switches to a single
timer stored in the BlockJob struct.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>
Tested-By: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
When block_job_sleep_ns() is called, the co-routine is scheduled for
future execution. If we allow the job to be re-entered prior to the
scheduled time, we present a race condition in which a coroutine can be
entered recursively, or even entered after the coroutine is deleted.
The job->busy flag is used by blockjobs when a coroutine is busy
executing. The function 'block_job_enter()' obeys the busy flag,
and will not enter a coroutine if set. If we sleep a job, we need to
leave the busy flag set, so that subsequent calls to block_job_enter()
are prevented.
This changes the prior behavior of block_job_cancel() being able to
immediately wake up and cancel a job; in practice, this should not be an
issue, as the coroutine sleep times are generally very small, and the
cancel will occur the next time the coroutine wakes up.
This fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1508708
Signed-off-by: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
All block jobs are using block_job_defer_to_main_loop as the final
step just before the coroutine terminates. At this point,
block_job_enter should do nothing, but currently it restarts
the freed coroutine.
Now, the job->co states should probably be changed to an enum
(e.g. BEFORE_START, STARTED, YIELDED, COMPLETED) subsuming
block_job_started, job->deferred_to_main_loop and job->busy.
For now, this patch eliminates the problematic reenter by
removing the reset of job->deferred_to_main_loop (which served
no purpose, as far as I could see) and checking the flag in
block_job_enter.
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20170508141310.8674-12-pbonzini@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
Remove use of block_job_pause/resume from outside blockjob.c, thus
making them static. The new functions are used by the block layer,
so place them in blockjob_int.h.
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20170508141310.8674-5-pbonzini@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
Outside blockjob.c, block_job_unref is only used when a block job fails
to start, and block_job_ref is not used at all. The reference counting
thus is pretty well hidden. Introduce a separate function to be used
by block jobs; because block_job_ref and block_job_unref now become
static, move them earlier in blockjob.c.
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20170508141310.8674-4-pbonzini@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
This is unused since commit 66a0fae ("blockjob: Don't touch BDS iostatus",
2016-05-19).
Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20170508141310.8674-3-pbonzini@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
This functions creates a BlockBackend internally, so the block jobs need
to tell it what they want to do with the BB.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Add an explicit start field to specify the entrypoint. We already have
ownership of the coroutine itself AND managing the lifetime of the
coroutine, let's take control of creation of the coroutine, too.
This will allow us to delay creation of the actual coroutine until we
know we'll actually start a BlockJob in block_job_start. This avoids
the sticky question of how to "un-create" a Coroutine that hasn't been
started yet.
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-id: 1478587839-9834-4-git-send-email-jsnow@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
Cleaning up after we have deferred to the main thread but before the
transaction has converged can be dangerous and result in deadlocks
if the job cleanup invokes any BH polling loops.
A job may attempt to begin cleaning up, but may induce another job to
enter its cleanup routine. The second job, part of our same transaction,
will block waiting for the first job to finish, so neither job may now
make progress.
To rectify this, allow jobs to register a cleanup operation that will
always run regardless of if the job was in a transaction or not, and
if the transaction job group completed successfully or not.
Move sensitive cleanup to this callback instead which is guaranteed to
be run only after the transaction has converged, which removes sensitive
timing constraints from said cleanup.
Furthermore, in future patches these cleanup operations will be performed
regardless of whether or not we actually started the job. Therefore,
cleanup callbacks should essentially confine themselves to undoing create
operations, e.g. setup actions taken in what is now backup_start.
Reported-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-id: 1478587839-9834-3-git-send-email-jsnow@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
(Trivial)
Fix wrong function names in documentation.
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
Message-id: 1477584421-1399-8-git-send-email-jsnow@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
To make it a little more obvious which functions are intended to be
public interface and which are intended to be for use only by jobs
themselves, split the interface into "public" and "private" files.
Convert blockjobs (e.g. block/backup) to using the private interface.
Leave blockdev and others on the public interface.
There are remaining uses of private state by qemu-img, and several
cases in blockdev.c and block/io.c where we grab job->blk for the
purposes of acquiring an AIOContext.
These will be corrected in future patches.
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
Message-id: 1477584421-1399-7-git-send-email-jsnow@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
Paolo Bonzini