[XAM] Changed behaviour of XamUserReadProfileSettings for invalid settings

This commit is contained in:
Gliniak 2025-05-30 18:56:46 +02:00
parent e601b5ab87
commit 6173cedde7
1 changed files with 13 additions and 21 deletions

View File

@ -274,26 +274,6 @@ uint32_t XamUserReadProfileSettingsEx(uint32_t title_id, uint32_t user_index,
return X_ERROR_NO_SUCH_USER;
}
// First call asks for size (fill buffer_size_ptr).
// Second call asks for buffer contents with that size.
bool any_missing = false;
for (uint32_t i = 0; i < setting_count; ++i) {
auto setting_id = static_cast<uint32_t>(setting_ids[i]);
if (!UserSetting::is_setting_valid(setting_id)) {
XELOGE(
"xeXamUserReadProfileSettingsEx requested unimplemented "
"setting "
"{:08X}",
setting_id);
any_missing = true;
}
}
if (any_missing) {
return X_ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER;
// TODO(benvanik): don't fail? most games don't even check!
}
auto out_header = reinterpret_cast<X_USER_READ_PROFILE_SETTINGS*>(buffer);
auto out_setting = reinterpret_cast<X_USER_PROFILE_SETTING*>(&out_header[1]);
out_header->setting_count = static_cast<uint32_t>(setting_count);
@ -307,7 +287,19 @@ uint32_t XamUserReadProfileSettingsEx(uint32_t title_id, uint32_t user_index,
std::fill_n(out_setting, setting_count, X_USER_PROFILE_SETTING{});
for (uint32_t n = 0; n < setting_count; ++n) {
uint32_t setting_id = setting_ids[n];
const uint32_t setting_id = setting_ids[n];
if (!UserSetting::is_setting_valid(setting_id)) {
if (setting_id != 0) {
XELOGE(
"xeXamUserReadProfileSettingsEx requested unimplemented "
"setting "
"{:08X}",
setting_id);
}
--out_header->setting_count;
continue;
}
const bool is_valid =
kernel_state()->xam_state()->user_tracker()->GetUserSetting(