ShuriZma
/
xenia-canary
mirror of https://github.com/xenia-canary/xenia-canary.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[GPU] Fix gamma ramp writing after RegisterFile API change (#2262)

This commit is contained in:
Triang3l 2024-05-18 23:53:09 +03:00
parent 8e7301f4d8
commit 210ac4b2d2
1 changed files with 20 additions and 7 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

27
src/xenia/gpu/command_processor.cc
View File

@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ void CommandProcessor::WriteRegister(uint32_t index, uint32_t value) {
case XE_GPU_REG_DC_LUT_SEQ_COLOR: {
// Should be in the 256-entry table writing mode.
assert_zero(regs[XE_GPU_REG_DC_LUT_RW_MODE] & 0b1);
auto& gamma_ramp_rw_index = regs.Get<reg::DC_LUT_RW_INDEX>();
auto gamma_ramp_rw_index = regs.Get<reg::DC_LUT_RW_INDEX>();
// DC_LUT_SEQ_COLOR is in the red, green, blue order, but the write
// enable mask is blue, green, red.
bool write_gamma_ramp_component =
@ -395,7 +395,11 @@ void CommandProcessor::WriteRegister(uint32_t index, uint32_t value) {
}
if (++gamma_ramp_rw_component_ >= 3) {
gamma_ramp_rw_component_ = 0;
++gamma_ramp_rw_index.rw_index;
reg::DC_LUT_RW_INDEX new_gamma_ramp_rw_index = gamma_ramp_rw_index;
++new_gamma_ramp_rw_index.rw_index;
WriteRegister(
XE_GPU_REG_DC_LUT_RW_INDEX,
xe::memory::Reinterpret<uint32_t>(new_gamma_ramp_rw_index));
}
if (write_gamma_ramp_component) {
OnGammaRamp256EntryTableValueWritten();
@ -405,7 +409,7 @@ void CommandProcessor::WriteRegister(uint32_t index, uint32_t value) {
case XE_GPU_REG_DC_LUT_PWL_DATA: {
// Should be in the PWL writing mode.
assert_not_zero(regs[XE_GPU_REG_DC_LUT_RW_MODE] & 0b1);
auto& gamma_ramp_rw_index = regs.Get<reg::DC_LUT_RW_INDEX>();
auto gamma_ramp_rw_index = regs.Get<reg::DC_LUT_RW_INDEX>();
// Bit 7 of the index is ignored for PWL.
uint32_t gamma_ramp_rw_index_pwl = gamma_ramp_rw_index.rw_index & 0x7F;
// DC_LUT_PWL_DATA is likely in the red, green, blue order because
@ -424,13 +428,17 @@ void CommandProcessor::WriteRegister(uint32_t index, uint32_t value) {
}
if (++gamma_ramp_rw_component_ >= 3) {
gamma_ramp_rw_component_ = 0;
reg::DC_LUT_RW_INDEX new_gamma_ramp_rw_index = gamma_ramp_rw_index;
// TODO(Triang3l): Should this increase beyond 7 bits for PWL?
// Direct3D 9 explicitly sets rw_index to 0x80 after writing the last
// PWL entry. However, the DC_LUT_RW_INDEX documentation says that for
// PWL, the bit 7 is ignored.
gamma_ramp_rw_index.rw_index =
new_gamma_ramp_rw_index.rw_index =
(gamma_ramp_rw_index.rw_index & ~UINT32_C(0x7F)) |
((gamma_ramp_rw_index_pwl + 1) & 0x7F);
WriteRegister(
XE_GPU_REG_DC_LUT_RW_INDEX,
xe::memory::Reinterpret<uint32_t>(new_gamma_ramp_rw_index));
}
if (write_gamma_ramp_component) {
OnGammaRampPWLValueWritten();
@ -440,7 +448,7 @@ void CommandProcessor::WriteRegister(uint32_t index, uint32_t value) {
case XE_GPU_REG_DC_LUT_30_COLOR: {
// Should be in the 256-entry table writing mode.
assert_zero(regs[XE_GPU_REG_DC_LUT_RW_MODE] & 0b1);
auto& gamma_ramp_rw_index = regs.Get<reg::DC_LUT_RW_INDEX>();
auto gamma_ramp_rw_index = regs.Get<reg::DC_LUT_RW_INDEX>();
uint32_t gamma_ramp_write_enable_mask =
regs[XE_GPU_REG_DC_LUT_WRITE_EN_MASK] & 0b111;
if (gamma_ramp_write_enable_mask) {
@ -457,11 +465,16 @@ void CommandProcessor::WriteRegister(uint32_t index, uint32_t value) {
gamma_ramp_entry.color_10_red = gamma_ramp_value.color_10_red;
}
}
++gamma_ramp_rw_index.rw_index;
// TODO(Triang3l): Should this reset the component write index? If this
// increase is assumed to behave like a full DC_LUT_RW_INDEX write, it
// probably should.
// probably should. Currently this also calls WriteRegister for
// DC_LUT_RW_INDEX, which resets gamma_ramp_rw_component_ as well.
gamma_ramp_rw_component_ = 0;
reg::DC_LUT_RW_INDEX new_gamma_ramp_rw_index = gamma_ramp_rw_index;
++new_gamma_ramp_rw_index.rw_index;
WriteRegister(
XE_GPU_REG_DC_LUT_RW_INDEX,
xe::memory::Reinterpret<uint32_t>(new_gamma_ramp_rw_index));
if (gamma_ramp_write_enable_mask) {
OnGammaRamp256EntryTableValueWritten();
}