mirror of https://github.com/xemu-project/xemu.git
ac1d88e9e7
It doesn't make sense to read the value of MDCR_EL2 on a non-A-profile CPU, and in fact if you try to do it we will assert: #6 0x00007ffff4b95e96 in __GI___assert_fail (assertion=0x5555565a8c70 "!arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_M)", file=0x5555565a6e5c "../../target/arm/helper.c", line=12600, function=0x5555565a9560 <__PRETTY_FUNCTION__.0> "arm_security_space_below_el3") at ./assert/assert.c:101 #7 0x0000555555ebf412 in arm_security_space_below_el3 (env=0x555557bc8190) at ../../target/arm/helper.c:12600 #8 0x0000555555ea6f89 in arm_is_el2_enabled (env=0x555557bc8190) at ../../target/arm/cpu.h:2595 #9 0x0000555555ea942f in arm_mdcr_el2_eff (env=0x555557bc8190) at ../../target/arm/internals.h:1512 We might call pmu_counter_enabled() on an M-profile CPU (for example from the migration pre/post hooks in machine.c); this should always return false because these CPUs don't set ARM_FEATURE_PMU. Avoid the assertion by not calling arm_mdcr_el2_eff() before we have done the early return for "PMU not present". This fixes an assertion failure if you try to do a loadvm or savevm for an M-profile board. Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org Resolves: https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2155 Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> Message-id: 20240208153346.970021-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| alpha | ||
| arm | ||
| avr | ||
| cris | ||
| hexagon | ||
| hppa | ||
| i386 | ||
| loongarch | ||
| m68k | ||
| microblaze | ||
| mips | ||
| nios2 | ||
| openrisc | ||
| ppc | ||
| riscv | ||
| rx | ||
| s390x | ||
| sh4 | ||
| sparc | ||
| tricore | ||
| xtensa | ||
| Kconfig | ||
| meson.build | ||
| target-common.c | ||