Implementation for instructions hashstp and hashchkp, the privileged
versions of hashst and hashchk, which were added in Power ISA 3.1B.
Signed-off-by: Víctor Colombo <victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br>
Reviewed-by: Lucas Mateus Castro <lucas.araujo@eldorado.org.br>
Message-Id: <20220715205439.161110-4-victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Implementation for instructions hashst and hashchk, which were added
in Power ISA 3.1B.
It was decided to implement the hash algorithm from ground up in this
patch exactly as described in Power ISA.
Signed-off-by: Víctor Colombo <victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br>
Reviewed-by: Lucas Mateus Castro <lucas.araujo@eldorado.org.br>
Message-Id: <20220715205439.161110-3-victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br>
[danielhb: fix block comment in excp_helper.c]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
msr_hv macro hides the usage of env->msr, which is a bad
behavior. Substitute it with FIELD_EX64 calls that explicitly use
env->msr as a parameter.
Suggested-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Víctor Colombo <victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20220504210541.115256-20-victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
msr_fe0 and msr_fe1 macros hide the usage of env->msr, which is a bad
behavior. Substitute it with FIELD_EX64 calls that explicitly use
env->msr as a parameter.
Suggested-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Víctor Colombo <victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20220504210541.115256-18-victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
msr_fp macro hides the usage of env->msr, which is a bad behavior
Substitute it with FIELD_EX64 calls that explicitly use env->msr
as a parameter.
Suggested-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Víctor Colombo <victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20220504210541.115256-13-victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
msr_me macro hides the usage of env->msr, which is a bad behavior
Substitute it with FIELD_EX64 calls that explicitly use env->msr
as a parameter.
Suggested-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Víctor Colombo <victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20220504210541.115256-11-victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
msr_pow macro hides the usage of env->msr, which is a bad behavior
Substitute it with FIELD_EX64 calls that explicitly use env->msr
as a parameter.
Suggested-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Víctor Colombo <victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20220504210541.115256-10-victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
msr_ce macro hides the usage of env->msr, which is a bad behavior
Substitute it with FIELD_EX64 calls that explicitly use env->msr
as a parameter.
Suggested-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Víctor Colombo <victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20220504210541.115256-9-victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
msr_ee macro hides the usage of env->msr, which is a bad behavior
Substitute it with FIELD_EX64 calls that explicitly use env->msr
as a parameter.
Suggested-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Víctor Colombo <victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20220504210541.115256-8-victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
msr_pr macro hides the usage of env->msr, which is a bad behavior
Substitute it with FIELD_EX64 calls that explicitly use env->msr
as a parameter.
Suggested-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Víctor Colombo <victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20220504210541.115256-4-victor.colombo@eldorado.org.br>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
This patch adds the EBB exception support that are triggered by
Performance Monitor alerts. This happens when a Performance Monitor
alert occurs and MMCR0_EBE, BESCR_PME and BESCR_GE are set.
fire_PMC_interrupt() will execute the raise_ebb_perfm_exception() helper
which will check for MMCR0_EBE, BESCR_PME and BESCR_GE bits. If all bits
are set, do_ebb() will attempt to trigger a PERFM EBB event.
If the EBB facility is enabled in both FSCR and HFSCR we consider that
the EBB is valid and set BESCR_PMEO. After that, if we're running in
problem state, fire a POWERPC_EXCP_PERM_EBB immediately. Otherwise we'll
queue a PPC_INTERRUPT_EBB.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20220225101140.1054160-5-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
PPC_INTERRUPT_EBB is a new interrupt that will be used to deliver EBB
exceptions that had to be postponed because the thread wasn't in problem
state at the time the event-based branch was supposed to occur.
ISA 3.1 also defines two EBB exceptions: Performance Monitor EBB
exception and External EBB exception. They are being added as
POWERPC_EXCP_PERFM_EBB and POWERPC_EXCP_EXTERNAL_EBB.
PPC_INTERRUPT_EBB will check BESCR bits to see the EBB type that
occurred and trigger the appropriate exception. Both exceptions are
doing the same thing in this first implementation: clear BESCR_GE and
enter the branch with env->nip retrieved from SPR_EBBHR.
The checks being done by the interrupt code are msr_pr and BESCR_GE
states. All other checks (EBB facility check, BESCR_PME bit, specific
bits related to the event type) must be done beforehand.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220225101140.1054160-4-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Many files use "qemu/log.h" declarations but neglect to include
it (they inherit it via "exec/exec-all.h"). "exec/exec-all.h" is
a core component and shouldn't be used that way. Move the
"qemu/log.h" inclusion locally to each unit requiring it.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20220207082756.82600-10-f4bug@amsat.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Introduce virtual hypervisor methods that can support a "Nested KVM HV"
implementation using the bare metal 2-level radix MMU, and using HV
exceptions to return from H_ENTER_NESTED (rather than cause interrupts).
HV exceptions can now be raised in the TCG spapr machine when running a
nested KVM HV guest. The main ones are the lev==1 syscall, the hdecr,
hdsi and hisi, hv fu, and hv emu, and h_virt external interrupts.
HV exceptions are intercepted in the exception handler code and instead
of causing interrupts in the guest and switching the machine to HV mode,
they go to the vhyp where it may exit the H_ENTER_NESTED hcall with the
interrupt vector numer as return value as required by the hcall API.
Address translation is provided by the 2-level page table walker that is
implemented for the bare metal radix MMU. The partition scope page table
is pointed to the L1's partition scope by the get_pate vhc method.
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220216102545.1808018-9-npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
This moves the logic to reset the QEMU exception state into its own
function.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
[ clg: checkpatch fixes ]
Message-Id: <20220216102545.1808018-8-npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The virtual hypervisor currently always intercepts and handles
hypercalls but with a future change this will not always be the case.
Add a helper for the test so the logic is abstracted from the mechanism.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20220216102545.1808018-7-npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
We don't really need to check for exception model while applying
AIL. We can check the lpcr_mask for the presence of
LPCR_AIL/LPCR_HAIL.
This removes one more instance of passing the exception model ID
around.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220207183036.1507882-5-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
We currently abort QEMU during the dispatch of an interrupt if we try
to set MSR_HV without having MSR_HVB in the msr_mask. I think we
should verify this for all MSR bits. There is no reason to ever have a
MSR bit set if the corresponding bit is not set in that CPU's
msr_mask.
Note that this is not about the emulated code setting reserved
bits. We clear the new_msr when starting to dispatch an exception, so
if we end up with bits not present in the msr_mask that is a QEMU
programming error.
I kept the HSRR verification for BookS because it is the only CPU
family that has HSRRs.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220207183036.1507882-4-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Make the cpu-specific powerpc_excp_* functions a bit simpler by moving
the bounds check and logging to powerpc_excp.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220207183036.1507882-3-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Now that all CPU families have their own separate exception
dispatching code we can remove powerpc_excp_legacy.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220207183036.1507882-2-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The 7xx CPUs don't have alternate/hypervisor Save and Restore
Registers, so we can set SRR0 and SRR1 directly.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220204173430.1457358-11-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
This code applies only to the 7xx CPUs, so we can remove the switch
statement.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220204173430.1457358-10-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Thre is no HV support in the 7xx.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220204173430.1457358-9-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Remove the BookE code and add a comment explaining why we need to keep
hypercall support even though this CPU does not have a hypervisor
mode.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220204173430.1457358-8-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
There's no ESR in the 7xx.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220204173430.1457358-7-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
There is no MSR_HV in the 7xx so remove the LPES0 handling.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220204173430.1457358-6-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
There's no MSR_HV in the 7xx.
Also remove 40x and BookE code.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220204173430.1457358-5-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Differences from the generic powerpc_excp code:
- Not BookE, so some MSR bits are cleared at interrupt dispatch;
- No MSR_HV;
- No power saving states;
- No Hypervisor Emulation Assistance;
- Not 64 bits;
- No System call vectored;
- No Alternate Interrupt Location.
Exceptions used:
POWERPC_EXCP_ALIGN
POWERPC_EXCP_DECR
POWERPC_EXCP_DLTLB
POWERPC_EXCP_DSI
POWERPC_EXCP_DSTLB
POWERPC_EXCP_EXTERNAL
POWERPC_EXCP_FPU
POWERPC_EXCP_IABR
POWERPC_EXCP_IFTLB
POWERPC_EXCP_ISI
POWERPC_EXCP_MCHECK
POWERPC_EXCP_PERFM
POWERPC_EXCP_PROGRAM
POWERPC_EXCP_RESET
POWERPC_EXCP_SMI
POWERPC_EXCP_SYSCALL
POWERPC_EXCP_THERM
POWERPC_EXCP_TRACE
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220204173430.1457358-4-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Introduce a new powerpc_excp function specific for PowerPC 7xx CPUs
(740, 745, 750, 750cl, 750cx, 750fx, 750gx, 755). This commit copies
powerpc_excp_legacy verbatim so the next one has a clean diff.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220204173430.1457358-3-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Since we've split the exception code by exception model, the exception
model IDs are becoming less useful. These two can be merged.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220204173430.1457358-2-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The 6xx CPUs don't have alternate/hypervisor Save and Restore
Registers, so we can set SRR0 and SRR1 directly.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220203200957.1434641-12-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
This code applies only to the 6xx CPUs, so we can remove the switch
statement.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220203200957.1434641-11-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
There is no HV support in the 6xx.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220203200957.1434641-10-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
There is no Hypervisor mode in the 6xx CPUs.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220203200957.1434641-9-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
There's no ESR in the 6xx CPUs.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220203200957.1434641-8-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
There's no Hypervisor mode in the 6xx, so remove all LPES0 logic.
Also remove BookE IRQ code.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220203200957.1434641-7-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
There's no MSR_HV in the 6xx CPUs.
Also remove the 40x and BookE code.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220203200957.1434641-6-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
This only applies to the G2s, the other 6xx CPUs will not have this
vector registered.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220203200957.1434641-5-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Introduce a new powerpc_excp function specific for PowerPC 6xx CPUs
(603, 604, G2, MPC5xx, MCP8xx). This commit copies powerpc_excp_legacy
verbatim so the next one has a clean diff.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220203200957.1434641-3-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
We don't need three separate exception model IDs for the 603, 604 and
G2.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220203200957.1434641-2-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The PowerPC 601 processor is the first generation of processors to
implement the PowerPC architecture. It was designed as a bridge
processor and also could execute most of the instructions of the
previous POWER architecture. It was found on the first Macs and IBM
RS/6000 workstations.
There is not much interest in keeping the CPU model of this
POWER-PowerPC bridge processor. We have the 603 and 604 CPU models of
the 60x family which implement the complete PowerPC instruction set.
Cc: "Hervé Poussineau" <hpoussin@reactos.org>
Cc: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220203142756.1302515-1-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
There is no MSR_HV in BookE, so remove all of the HV logic.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220128224018.1228062-12-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Remove the switch as this function applies to BookE only.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220128224018.1228062-11-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
QEMU does not support BookE as a hypervisor.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220128224018.1228062-10-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
BookE has no DSISR or DAR. The proper registers ESR and DEAR were
already set at this point.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220128224018.1228062-9-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
There is no LPES0 in BookE and no MSR_HV.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220128224018.1228062-8-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The SRR1 should be set to the MSR value. There are no diagnostic bits
in the SRR1 for BookE.
Note that this fixes a bug where MSR_GS would be set and Linux would
go into KVM code when there's no KVM guest.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220128224018.1228062-7-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
There is no DSISR or DAR in BookE. Change to ESR and DEAR.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220128224018.1228062-6-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
There's no MSR_HV in BookE.
Also remove 40x code.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220128224018.1228062-5-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Introduce a new powerpc_excp function specific for BookE CPUs. This
commit copies powerpc_excp_legacy verbatim so the next one has a clean
diff.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220128224018.1228062-2-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The 602 was derived from the PowerPC 603, for the gaming market it
seems. It was hardly used and no firmware supporting the CPU could be
found. Drop support.
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The 74xx does not have alternate/hypervisor Save and Restore
Registers, so we can set SRR0 and SRR1 directly.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220127201116.1154733-9-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The whole power saving states logic seems to be dependent on HV mode,
which don't exist for 74xx so I'm removing it all and leaving the
abort message.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220127201116.1154733-8-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Remove the BookE code and add a comment explaining why we need to keep
hypercall support even though this CPU does not have a hypervisor
mode.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220127201116.1154733-7-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The 74xx don't have MSR_HV so all the LPES0 logic can be removed.
Also remove the BookE IRQ code.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220127201116.1154733-5-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The 74xx don't have an MSR_HV.
Also remove 40x and BookE code.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220127201116.1154733-4-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Differences from the generic powerpc_excp code:
- Not BookE, so some MSR bits are cleared at interrupt dispatch;
- No MSR_HV;
- No power saving states;
- No Hypervisor Emulation Assistance;
- Not 64 bits;
- No System call vectored;
- No Alternate Interrupt Location.
Exceptions used:
POWERPC_EXCP_ALIGN
POWERPC_EXCP_DECR
POWERPC_EXCP_DSI
POWERPC_EXCP_EXTERNAL
POWERPC_EXCP_FPU
POWERPC_EXCP_IABR
POWERPC_EXCP_ISI
POWERPC_EXCP_MCHECK
POWERPC_EXCP_PERFM
POWERPC_EXCP_PROGRAM
POWERPC_EXCP_RESET
POWERPC_EXCP_SMI
POWERPC_EXCP_SYSCALL
POWERPC_EXCP_THERM
POWERPC_EXCP_TRACE
POWERPC_EXCP_VPU
POWERPC_EXCP_VPUA
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220127201116.1154733-3-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Introduce a new powerpc_excp function specific for PowerPC 74xx
CPUs. This commit copies powerpc_excp_legacy verbatim so the next one
has a clean diff.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220127201116.1154733-2-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Since this is now BookS only, we can simplify the code a bit and check
has_hv_mode instead of enumerating the exception models. LPES0 does
not make sense if there is no MSR_HV.
Note that QEMU does not support HV mode on 970 and POWER5+ so we don't
set MSR_HV in msr_mask.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220124184605.999353-5-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Differences from the generic powerpc_excp code:
- Not BookE, so some MSR bits are cleared at interrupt dispatch;
- Always uses HV_EMU if the CPU has MSR_HV;
- Exceptions always delivered in 64 bit.
Exceptions used:
POWERPC_EXCP_ALIGN
POWERPC_EXCP_DECR
POWERPC_EXCP_DSEG
POWERPC_EXCP_DSI
POWERPC_EXCP_EXTERNAL
POWERPC_EXCP_FPU
POWERPC_EXCP_FU
POWERPC_EXCP_HDECR
POWERPC_EXCP_HDSI
POWERPC_EXCP_HISI
POWERPC_EXCP_HVIRT
POWERPC_EXCP_HV_EMU
POWERPC_EXCP_HV_FU
POWERPC_EXCP_ISEG
POWERPC_EXCP_ISI
POWERPC_EXCP_MAINT
POWERPC_EXCP_MCHECK
POWERPC_EXCP_PERFM
POWERPC_EXCP_PROGRAM
POWERPC_EXCP_RESET
POWERPC_EXCP_SDOOR_HV
POWERPC_EXCP_SYSCALL
POWERPC_EXCP_SYSCALL_VECTORED
POWERPC_EXCP_THERM
POWERPC_EXCP_TRACE
POWERPC_EXCP_VPU
POWERPC_EXCP_VPUA
POWERPC_EXCP_VSXU
POWERPC_EXCP_HV_MAINT
POWERPC_EXCP_SDOOR
(I added the two above that were not being considered. They used to be
"Invalid exception". Now they become "Unimplemented exception" which
is more accurate.)
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220124184605.999353-3-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Introduce a new powerpc_excp function specific for BookS CPUs. This
commit copies powerpc_excp_legacy verbatim so the next one has a clean
diff.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220124184605.999353-2-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The 405 Program Interrupt does not set SRR1 with any diagnostic bits,
just a clean copy of the MSR.
We're using the BookE Exception Syndrome Register which is different
from the 405.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
[ clg: restored SPR_40x_ESR settings ]
Message-Id: <20220118184448.852996-14-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The 405 ISI does not set SRR1 with any exception syndrome bits, only a
clean copy of the MSR.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
[ clg : Fixed removal which was done in the wrong routine ]
Message-Id: <20220118184448.852996-13-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The 405 has no DSISR or DAR, so convert the trace entry to
use ESR and DEAR instead.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
[ clg : - changed registers to ESR and DEAR.
- updated commit log ]
Message-Id: <20220118184448.852996-12-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The current Debug exception dispatch is the BookE one, so it is
different from the 405. We effectively don't support the 405 Debug
exception.
This patch removes the BookE code and moves the DEBUG into the "not
implemented" block.
Note that there is in theory a functional change here since we now
abort when a Debug exception happens. However, given how it was never
implemented, I don't believe this to have ever been dispatched for the
405.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220118184448.852996-11-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
There is no DSISR in the 405. It uses DEAR which we already set
earlier at ppc_cpu_do_unaligned_access.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au
Message-Id: <20220118184448.852996-10-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
405 has no MSR_HV and EPR is BookE only so we can remove it all.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220118184448.852996-8-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
powerpc_excp_40x applies only to the 405, so remove HV code and
references to BookE.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220118184448.852996-7-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
In powerpc_excp_40x the Critical exception is now for 405 only, so we
can remove the BookE and G2 blocks.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20220118184448.852996-6-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Differences from the generic powerpc_excp code:
- Not BookE, so some MSR bits are cleared at interrupt dispatch;
- No MSR_HV or MSR_LE;
- No power saving states;
- No Hypervisor Emulation Assistance;
- Not 64 bits;
- No System call vectored;
- No Interrupts Little Endian;
- No Alternate Interrupt Location.
Exceptions used:
POWERPC_EXCP_ALIGN
POWERPC_EXCP_CRITICAL
POWERPC_EXCP_DEBUG
POWERPC_EXCP_DSI
POWERPC_EXCP_DTLB
POWERPC_EXCP_EXTERNAL
POWERPC_EXCP_FIT
POWERPC_EXCP_ISI
POWERPC_EXCP_ITLB
POWERPC_EXCP_MCHECK
POWERPC_EXCP_PIT
POWERPC_EXCP_PROGRAM
POWERPC_EXCP_SYSCALL
POWERPC_EXCP_WDT
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220118184448.852996-5-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Introduce a new powerpc_excp function specific for 40x CPUs. This
commit copies powerpc_excp_legacy verbatim so the next one has a clean
diff.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20220118184448.852996-4-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
After a TLB miss exception, GPRs 0-3 must be restored on rfi.
This is managed by hreg_store_msr() which is called by do_rfi()
However, hreg_store_msr() does it if MSR[TGPR] is unset in the
passed MSR value.
The problem is that do_rfi() is given the content of SRR1 as
the value to be set in MSR, but TGPR bit is not part of SRR1
and that bit is used for something else and is sometimes set
to 1, leading to hreg_store_msr() not restoring GPRs.
So, do the same way as for POW bit, force clearing it.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: Cedric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Cc: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220120103824.239573-1-christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Next patches will split powerpc_excp in multiple family specific
handlers. This patch adds a wrapper to make the transition clearer.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220107222601.4101511-8-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The ppc_interrupts_little_endian function is now suitable for
determining the endianness of interrupts for all CPUs.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220107222601.4101511-7-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The ppc_interrupts_little_endian function could be used for interrupts
delivered in Hypervisor mode, so add support for powernv8 and powernv9
to it.
Also drop the comment because it is inaccurate, all CPUs that can run
little endian can have interrupts in little endian. The point is
whether they can take interrupts in an endianness different from
MSR_LE.
This change has no functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220107222601.4101511-5-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Remove the compile time definition and make the logging be controlled
by the `-d mmu` option in the cmdline.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20220107222601.4101511-3-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
We can just access it directly in powerpc_excp.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
[ clg: Took into account removal of inline ]
Message-Id: <20211229165751.3774248-6-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Now that 'vector' is known before calling the interrupt-specific setup
code, we can move all of the scv setup into one place.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20211229165751.3774248-5-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
None of the interrupt setup code touches 'vector', so we can move it
earlier in the function. This will allow us to later move the System
Call Vectored setup that is on the top level into the
POWERPC_EXCP_SYSCALL_VECTORED code block.
This patch also moves the verification for when 'excp' does not have
an address associated with it. We now bail a little earlier when that
is the case. This should not cause any visible effects.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20211229165751.3774248-4-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The next patch will start accessing the excp_vectors array earlier in
the function, so add a bounds check as first thing here.
This converts the empty return on POWERPC_EXCP_NONE to an error. This
exception number never reaches this function and if it does it
probably means something else went wrong up the line.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20211229165751.3774248-3-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
There are currently only two interrupts that use alternate SRRs, so
let them write to them directly during the setup code.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Message-Id: <20211229165751.3774248-2-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
It facilitates reading the logs when mask CPU_LOG_INT is activated. We
should do the same for error codes.
Cc: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20211222064025.1541490-2-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220103063441.3424853-3-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The compiler should know better how to inline code if necessary.
Suggested-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-Id: <20220103063441.3424853-2-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
An Event-Based Branch (EBB) allows applications to change the NIA when a
event-based exception occurs. Event-based exceptions are enabled by
setting the Branch Event Status and Control Register (BESCR). If the
event-based exception is enabled when the exception occurs, an EBB
happens.
The following operations happens during an EBB:
- Global Enable (GE) bit of BESCR is set to 0;
- bits 0-61 of the Event-Based Branch Return Register (EBBRR) are set
to the the effective address of the NIA that would have executed if the EBB
didn't happen;
- Instruction fetch and execution will continue in the effective address
contained in the Event-Based Branch Handler Register (EBBHR).
The EBB Handler will process the event and then execute the Return From
Event-Based Branch (rfebb) instruction. rfebb sets BESCR_GE and then
redirects execution to the address pointed in EBBRR. This process is
described in the PowerISA v3.1, Book II, Chapter 6 [1].
This patch implements the rfebb instruction. Descriptions of all
relevant BESCR bits are also added - this patch is only using BESCR_GE,
but the next patches will use the remaining bits.
[1] https://wiki.raptorcs.com/w/images/f/f5/PowerISA_public.v3.1.pdf
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Matheus Ferst <matheus.ferst@eldorado.org.br>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20211201151734.654994-9-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
This reverts commit 336e91f853.
It breaks the --disable-tcg build:
../target/ppc/excp_helper.c:463:29: error: implicit declaration of
function ‘cpu_ldl_code’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
We should not have TCG code in powerpc_excp because some kvm-only
routines use it indirectly to dispatch interrupts. See
kvm_handle_debug, spapr_mce_req_event and
spapr_do_system_reset_on_cpu.
We can re-introduce the change once we have split the interrupt
injection code between KVM and TCG.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20211209173323.2166642-1-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
When Altivec support was added to the e6500 kernel in 2012[1], the
QEMU code was not changed, so we don't register the VPU/VPUA
exceptions for the e6500:
qemu: fatal: Raised an exception without defined vector 73
Note that the error message says 73, instead of 32, which is the IVOR
for VPU. This is because QEMU knows only knows about the VPU interrupt
for the 7400s. In theory, we should not be raising _that_ VPU
interrupt, but instead another one specific for the e6500.
We unfortunately cannot register e6500-specific VPU/VPUA interrupts
because the SPEU/EFPDI interrupts also use IVOR32/33. These are
present only in the e500v1/2 versions. From the user manual:
e500v1, e500v2: only SPEU/EFPDI/EFPRI
e500mc, e5500: no SPEU/EFPDI/EFPRI/VPU/VPUA
e6500: only VPU/VPUA
So I'm leaving IVOR32/33 as SPEU/EFPDI, but altering the dispatch code
to convert the VPU #73 to a #32 when we're in the e6500. Since the
handling for SPEU and VPU is the same this is the only change that's
needed. The EFPDI is not implemented and will cause an abort. I don't
think it worth it changing the error message to take VPUA into
consideration, so I'm not changing anything there.
This bug was discussed in the thread:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-ppc/2021-06/msg00222.html
1- https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/cd66cc2ee52
Reported-by: <mario@locati.it>
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20211213133542.2608540-1-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
They have been there since 2007 without any board using them, most
were protected by a TODO define. Drop support.
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20211202191108.1291515-1-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
The 603e uses the same exception code as 603 so we don't need a
dedicated entry for it.
This is only a removal of redundant code, no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas <farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20211208123029.2052625-3-farosas@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Víctor Colombo