mirror of https://github.com/xemu-project/xemu.git
target/ppc: fix vbpermd in big endian hosts
The extract64 arguments are not endian dependent as they are only used for bitwise operations. The current behavior in little-endian hosts is correct; since the indexes in VRB are in PowerISA-ordering, we should always invert the value before calling extract64. Also, using the VsrD macro, we can have a single EXTRACT_BIT definition for big and little-endian with the correct behavior. Signed-off-by: Matheus Ferst <matheus.ferst@eldorado.org.br> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> Message-Id: <20220601125355.1266165-1-matheus.ferst@eldorado.org.br> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
453eb94c76
commit
8f7d41e0c9
|
@ -1413,14 +1413,13 @@ XXGENPCV(XXGENPCVDM, 8)
|
|||
#define VBPERMQ_INDEX(avr, i) ((avr)->u8[(i)])
|
||||
#define VBPERMD_INDEX(i) (i)
|
||||
#define VBPERMQ_DW(index) (((index) & 0x40) != 0)
|
||||
#define EXTRACT_BIT(avr, i, index) (extract64((avr)->u64[i], index, 1))
|
||||
#else
|
||||
#define VBPERMQ_INDEX(avr, i) ((avr)->u8[15 - (i)])
|
||||
#define VBPERMD_INDEX(i) (1 - i)
|
||||
#define VBPERMQ_DW(index) (((index) & 0x40) == 0)
|
||||
#define EXTRACT_BIT(avr, i, index) \
|
||||
(extract64((avr)->u64[1 - i], 63 - index, 1))
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
#define EXTRACT_BIT(avr, i, index) \
|
||||
(extract64((avr)->VsrD(i), 63 - index, 1))
|
||||
|
||||
void helper_vbpermd(ppc_avr_t *r, ppc_avr_t *a, ppc_avr_t *b)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue