machine: Improve the error reporting of smp parsing

We have two requirements for a valid SMP configuration:
the product of "sockets * cores * threads" must represent all the
possible cpus, i.e., max_cpus, and then must include the initially
present cpus, i.e., smp_cpus.

So we only need to ensure 1) "sockets * cores * threads == maxcpus"
at first and then ensure 2) "maxcpus >= cpus". With a reasonable
order of the sanity check, we can simplify the error reporting code.
When reporting an error message we also report the exact value of
each topology member to make users easily see what's going on.

Signed-off-by: Yanan Wang <wangyanan55@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@ionos.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210929025816.21076-7-wangyanan55@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Yanan Wang 2021-09-29 10:58:06 +08:00 committed by Paolo Bonzini
parent 7d8c5a3962
commit 52082d3ba4
2 changed files with 19 additions and 27 deletions

View File

@ -782,25 +782,21 @@ static void smp_parse(MachineState *ms, SMPConfiguration *config, Error **errp)
maxcpus = maxcpus > 0 ? maxcpus : sockets * cores * threads;
cpus = cpus > 0 ? cpus : maxcpus;
if (sockets * cores * threads < cpus) {
error_setg(errp, "cpu topology: "
"sockets (%u) * cores (%u) * threads (%u) < "
"smp_cpus (%u)",
sockets, cores, threads, cpus);
if (sockets * cores * threads != maxcpus) {
error_setg(errp, "Invalid CPU topology: "
"product of the hierarchy must match maxcpus: "
"sockets (%u) * cores (%u) * threads (%u) "
"!= maxcpus (%u)",
sockets, cores, threads, maxcpus);
return;
}
if (maxcpus < cpus) {
error_setg(errp, "maxcpus must be equal to or greater than smp");
return;
}
if (sockets * cores * threads != maxcpus) {
error_setg(errp, "Invalid CPU topology: "
"maxcpus must be equal to or greater than smp: "
"sockets (%u) * cores (%u) * threads (%u) "
"!= maxcpus (%u)",
sockets, cores, threads,
maxcpus);
"== maxcpus (%u) < smp_cpus (%u)",
sockets, cores, threads, maxcpus, cpus);
return;
}

View File

@ -749,25 +749,21 @@ static void pc_smp_parse(MachineState *ms, SMPConfiguration *config, Error **err
maxcpus = maxcpus > 0 ? maxcpus : sockets * dies * cores * threads;
cpus = cpus > 0 ? cpus : maxcpus;
if (sockets * dies * cores * threads < cpus) {
error_setg(errp, "cpu topology: "
"sockets (%u) * dies (%u) * cores (%u) * threads (%u) < "
"smp_cpus (%u)",
sockets, dies, cores, threads, cpus);
if (sockets * dies * cores * threads != maxcpus) {
error_setg(errp, "Invalid CPU topology: "
"product of the hierarchy must match maxcpus: "
"sockets (%u) * dies (%u) * cores (%u) * threads (%u) "
"!= maxcpus (%u)",
sockets, dies, cores, threads, maxcpus);
return;
}
if (maxcpus < cpus) {
error_setg(errp, "maxcpus must be equal to or greater than smp");
return;
}
if (sockets * dies * cores * threads != maxcpus) {
error_setg(errp, "Invalid CPU topology deprecated: "
error_setg(errp, "Invalid CPU topology: "
"maxcpus must be equal to or greater than smp: "
"sockets (%u) * dies (%u) * cores (%u) * threads (%u) "
"!= maxcpus (%u)",
sockets, dies, cores, threads,
maxcpus);
"== maxcpus (%u) < smp_cpus (%u)",
sockets, dies, cores, threads, maxcpus, cpus);
return;
}