RSP: Have Compile_SW handle DMEM overflow better

This commit is contained in:
zilmar 2024-07-12 15:04:18 +09:30
parent 6e4852fc78
commit 8c6856f1c8
1 changed files with 8 additions and 10 deletions

View File

@ -1107,9 +1107,7 @@ void Compile_LWU(void)
CPU_Message(" %X %s", CompilePC, RSPInstruction(CompilePC, RSPOpC.Value).NameAndParam().c_str());
return;
}
Cheat_r4300iOpcode(RSP_Opcode_LWU, "RSP_Opcode_LWU");
return;
}
void Compile_SB(void)
@ -1261,14 +1259,14 @@ void Compile_SW(void)
return;
}
uint32_t Value = MipsRegConst(RSPOpC.rt);
sprintf(Address, "DMEM + %Xh", (Addr + 0) ^ 3);
MoveConstByteToVariable((Value >> 24) & 0xFF, RSPInfo.DMEM + ((Addr + 0) ^ 3), Address);
sprintf(Address, "DMEM + %Xh", (Addr + 1) ^ 3);
MoveConstByteToVariable((Value >> 16) & 0xFF, RSPInfo.DMEM + ((Addr + 1) ^ 3), Address);
sprintf(Address, "DMEM + %Xh", (Addr + 2) ^ 3);
MoveConstByteToVariable((Value >> 8) & 0xFF, RSPInfo.DMEM + ((Addr + 2) ^ 3), Address);
sprintf(Address, "DMEM + %Xh", (Addr + 3) ^ 3);
MoveConstByteToVariable((Value >> 0) & 0xFF, RSPInfo.DMEM + ((Addr + 3) ^ 3), Address);
sprintf(Address, "DMEM + %Xh", ((Addr + 0) ^ 3) & 0xFFF);
MoveConstByteToVariable((Value >> 24) & 0xFF, RSPInfo.DMEM + (((Addr + 0) ^ 3) & 0xFFF), Address);
sprintf(Address, "DMEM + %Xh", ((Addr + 1) ^ 3) & 0xFFF);
MoveConstByteToVariable((Value >> 16) & 0xFF, RSPInfo.DMEM + (((Addr + 1) ^ 3) & 0xFFF), Address);
sprintf(Address, "DMEM + %Xh", ((Addr + 2) ^ 3) & 0xFFF);
MoveConstByteToVariable((Value >> 8) & 0xFF, RSPInfo.DMEM + (((Addr + 2) ^ 3) & 0xFFF), Address);
sprintf(Address, "DMEM + %Xh", ((Addr + 3) ^ 3) & 0xFFF);
MoveConstByteToVariable((Value >> 0) & 0xFF, RSPInfo.DMEM + (((Addr + 3) ^ 3) & 0xFFF), Address);
}
else
{