[Tests] add unit tests for accounts (#2748)
* add unit tests for accounts * only import from vitest (not node:test) * resolve comments * improve test coverage for accounts.updateUserInfo * add test coverage for account.initLoggedInUser() * code style improvements
This commit is contained in:
parent
b16bd89f17
commit
cc36cdb1a8
|
@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
|
|||
import * as battleScene from "#app/battle-scene.js";
|
||||
import { describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
|
||||
import { initLoggedInUser, loggedInUser, updateUserInfo } from "../account";
|
||||
import * as utils from "../utils";
|
||||
|
||||
describe("account", () => {
|
||||
describe("initLoggedInUser", () => {
|
||||
it("should set loggedInUser to Guest and lastSessionSlot to -1", () => {
|
||||
initLoggedInUser();
|
||||
|
||||
expect(loggedInUser.username).toBe("Guest");
|
||||
expect(loggedInUser.lastSessionSlot).toBe(-1);
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
describe("updateUserInfo", () => {
|
||||
it("should set loggedInUser to Guest if bypassLogin is true", async () => {
|
||||
vi.spyOn(battleScene, "bypassLogin", "get").mockReturnValue(true);
|
||||
|
||||
const [success, status] = await updateUserInfo();
|
||||
|
||||
expect(success).toBe(true);
|
||||
expect(status).toBe(200);
|
||||
expect(loggedInUser.username).toBe("Guest");
|
||||
expect(loggedInUser.lastSessionSlot).toBe(-1);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("should fetch user info from the API if bypassLogin is false", async () => {
|
||||
vi.spyOn(battleScene, "bypassLogin", "get").mockReturnValue(false);
|
||||
vi.spyOn(utils, "apiFetch").mockResolvedValue(
|
||||
new Response(
|
||||
JSON.stringify({
|
||||
username: "test",
|
||||
lastSessionSlot: 99,
|
||||
}),
|
||||
{
|
||||
status: 200,
|
||||
}
|
||||
)
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
const [success, status] = await updateUserInfo();
|
||||
|
||||
expect(success).toBe(true);
|
||||
expect(status).toBe(200);
|
||||
expect(loggedInUser.username).toBe("test");
|
||||
expect(loggedInUser.lastSessionSlot).toBe(99);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("should handle resolved API errors", async () => {
|
||||
vi.spyOn(battleScene, "bypassLogin", "get").mockReturnValue(false);
|
||||
vi.spyOn(utils, "apiFetch").mockResolvedValue(
|
||||
new Response(null, { status: 401 })
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
const [success, status] = await updateUserInfo();
|
||||
|
||||
expect(success).toBe(false);
|
||||
expect(status).toBe(401);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("should handle rejected API errors", async () => {
|
||||
const consoleErrorSpy = vi.spyOn(console, "error");
|
||||
vi.spyOn(battleScene, "bypassLogin", "get").mockReturnValue(false);
|
||||
vi.spyOn(utils, "apiFetch").mockRejectedValue(new Error("Api failed!"));
|
||||
|
||||
const [success, status] = await updateUserInfo();
|
||||
|
||||
expect(success).toBe(false);
|
||||
expect(status).toBe(500);
|
||||
expect(consoleErrorSpy).toHaveBeenCalled();
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue