ShuriZma
/
pcsx2
mirror of https://github.com/PCSX2/pcsx2.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Vsync: Put it back to half slices, there seems to be games which don't like the vsync timing more accurate either way. Until i can work out why we will go back to the old half n half timing which all known games seem happy with. 

git-svn-id: http://pcsx2.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@5903 96395faa-99c1-11dd-bbfe-3dabce05a288
This commit is contained in:
refraction 2014-02-16 16:07:14 +00:00
parent 888f0a27da
commit f3399ead26
1 changed files with 1 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
pcsx2/Counters.cpp
View File

@ -197,10 +197,7 @@ static void vSyncInfoCalc( vSyncTimingInfo* info, Fixed100 framesPerSecond, u32
// One test we have shows that VBlank lasts for ~22 HBlanks, another we have show that is the time it's off.
// There exists a game (Legendz Gekitou! Saga Battle) Which runs REALLY slowly if VBlank is ~22 HBlanks, so the other test wins.
u64 Blank = (Frame / scansPerFrame) * ((scansPerFrame / 2) - 22); // PAL VBlank Period is off for roughly 22 HSyncs
if(scansPerFrame < SCANLINES_TOTAL_PAL) //Assume NTSC
Blank = (Frame / scansPerFrame) * ((scansPerFrame /2) - 26); // NTSC VBlank Period is off for roughly 26 HSyncs, so we update
u64 Blank = HalfFrame; // PAL VBlank Period is off for roughly 22 HSyncs
//I would have suspected this to be Frame - Blank, but that seems to completely freak it out
//and the test results are completely wrong. It seems 100% the same as the PS2 test on this,