mirror of https://github.com/PCSX2/pcsx2.git
Sio: use & 0xFF instead of u8 mask
Tentative to avoid various bad coverity reports
This commit is contained in:
parent
2da6cb263d
commit
356429d0e7
|
@ -433,7 +433,9 @@ SIO_WRITE memcardWrite(u8 data)
|
|||
case 2:
|
||||
transfer_size = data;
|
||||
|
||||
sio.buf[data + 5] = mcd->term;
|
||||
// Note: coverity wrongly detects a buffer overflow. Because data + 5 could be > 512...
|
||||
// So let's add a mask-nop to avoid various useless reports.
|
||||
sio.buf[(data & 0xFF) + 5] = mcd->term;
|
||||
sio.bufSize = data + 5;
|
||||
checksum_pos = data + 4;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -270,13 +270,13 @@ static __fi void _HwWrite_16or32_Page1( u32 addr, T val )
|
|||
{
|
||||
// ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
mcase(HW_SIO_DATA):
|
||||
sioWrite8( (u8)val );
|
||||
sioWrite8( (u8)(val >> 8) );
|
||||
sioWrite8( val & 0xFF );
|
||||
sioWrite8( (val >> 8) & 0xFF );
|
||||
if( sizeof(T) == 4 )
|
||||
{
|
||||
// u32 gets rid of compiler warnings when using the u16 version of this template
|
||||
sioWrite8( (u8)((u32)val >> 16) );
|
||||
sioWrite8( (u8)((u32)val >> 24) );
|
||||
sioWrite8( ((u32)val >> 16) & 0xFF );
|
||||
sioWrite8( ((u32)val >> 24) & 0xFF );
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue