fix ldrd/strd itcm timings
This commit is contained in:
parent
8fff17f03f
commit
e254ac3240
|
@ -317,6 +317,7 @@ A_IMPLEMENT_WB_LDRSTR(LDRB)
|
|||
ExecuteStage<true>(cpu, ilmask | (1 << ((cpu->CurInstr>>16) & 0xF))); \
|
||||
bool dabort = !cpu->DataRead32(offset, &cpu->R[r]); \
|
||||
u32 val; dabort |= !cpu->DataRead32S(offset+4, &val); \
|
||||
if (cpu->DataRegion == Mem9_ITCM) cpu->NDS.ARM9Timestamp += 2; \
|
||||
cpu->AddCycles_CDI(); \
|
||||
if (dabort) { \
|
||||
((ARMv5*)cpu)->DataAbort(); \
|
||||
|
@ -337,6 +338,7 @@ A_IMPLEMENT_WB_LDRSTR(LDRB)
|
|||
ExecuteStage<true>(cpu, ilmask | (1 << ((cpu->CurInstr>>16) & 0xF))); \
|
||||
bool dabort = !cpu->DataRead32(addr, &cpu->R[r]); \
|
||||
u32 val; dabort |= !cpu->DataRead32S(addr+4, &val); \
|
||||
if (cpu->DataRegion == Mem9_ITCM) cpu->NDS.ARM9Timestamp += 2; \
|
||||
cpu->AddCycles_CDI(); \
|
||||
if (dabort) { \
|
||||
((ARMv5*)cpu)->DataAbort(); \
|
||||
|
@ -359,6 +361,7 @@ A_IMPLEMENT_WB_LDRSTR(LDRB)
|
|||
bool dabort = !cpu->DataWrite32(offset, cpu->R[r]); /* yes, this data abort behavior is on purpose */ \
|
||||
u32 storeval = cpu->R[r+1]; if (r == 14) storeval+=4; \
|
||||
dabort |= !cpu->DataWrite32S (offset+4, storeval); /* no, i dont understand it either */ \
|
||||
if (cpu->DataRegion == Mem9_ITCM) cpu->NDS.ARM9Timestamp += 2; \
|
||||
cpu->AddCycles_CD(); \
|
||||
if (dabort) [[unlikely]] { \
|
||||
((ARMv5*)cpu)->DataAbort(); \
|
||||
|
@ -375,6 +378,7 @@ A_IMPLEMENT_WB_LDRSTR(LDRB)
|
|||
bool dabort = !cpu->DataWrite32(addr, cpu->R[r]); \
|
||||
u32 storeval = cpu->R[r+1]; if (r == 14) storeval+=4; \
|
||||
dabort |= !cpu->DataWrite32S (addr+4, storeval); \
|
||||
if (cpu->DataRegion == Mem9_ITCM) cpu->NDS.ARM9Timestamp += 2; \
|
||||
cpu->AddCycles_CD(); \
|
||||
if (dabort) [[unlikely]] { \
|
||||
((ARMv5*)cpu)->DataAbort(); \
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue