From 9c1ea0e539d797720ec5b0eaf999577ee5747eef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arisotura <thetotalworm@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 13:31:27 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] guess after all we shouldn't send ACKs for nonexistant I2C
 devices

---
 src/DSi_I2C.cpp | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/DSi_I2C.cpp b/src/DSi_I2C.cpp
index ffb724ff..5ced51e8 100644
--- a/src/DSi_I2C.cpp
+++ b/src/DSi_I2C.cpp
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ void WriteCnt(u8 val)
                 case 0x7A: DSi_Camera1->Start(); break;
                 default:
                     printf("I2C: %s start on unknown device %02X\n", (Data&0x01)?"read":"write", Device);
-                    //ack = false;
+                    ack = false;
                     break;
                 }
             }
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ void WriteCnt(u8 val)
                 case 0x7A: DSi_Camera1->Write(Data, islast); break;
                 default:
                     printf("I2C: write on unknown device %02X, cnt=%02X, data=%02X, last=%d\n", Device, val, Data, islast);
-                    //ack = false;
+                    ack = false;
                     break;
                 }
             }