Palm OS (Mu): Removing the unavailable BIOS
As these BIOSes were only used internally for testing purposes is it necessary to keep them? This is a fairly sensitive question, as the author, @meepingsnesroms, has left us, this information can also have a strong sentimental value. So I apologize if the question offends the sensitivity of those who might find the question offensive.
This commit is contained in:
parent
1ec12eedfe
commit
0f8f0231f4
|
@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
|
|||
|
||||
display_name = "Palm OS (Mu)"
|
||||
authors = "guicrith / meepingsnesroms"
|
||||
supported_extensions = "prc|pqa|img"
|
||||
|
@ -11,26 +12,10 @@ display_version = "v1.1.0"
|
|||
supports_no_game = "true"
|
||||
|
||||
# BIOS/Firmware
|
||||
firmware_count = 5
|
||||
|
||||
firmware0_desc = "palmos40-en-m500.rom (Palm OS 4.0)"
|
||||
firmware0_path = "palmos40-en-m500.rom"
|
||||
firmware0_opt = "true"
|
||||
firmware_count = 1
|
||||
|
||||
firmware1_desc = "palmos41-en-m515.rom (Palm OS 4.1)"
|
||||
firmware1_path = "palmos41-en-m515.rom"
|
||||
firmware1_opt = "true"
|
||||
|
||||
firmware2_desc = "palmos52-en-t3.rom (Palm OS 5.2.1)"
|
||||
firmware2_path = "palmos52-en-t3.rom"
|
||||
firmware2_opt = "true"
|
||||
|
||||
firmware3_desc = "palmos60-en-t3.rom (Palm OS 6.0)"
|
||||
firmware3_path = "palmos60-en-t3.rom"
|
||||
firmware3_opt = "true"
|
||||
|
||||
firmware4_desc = "bootloader-dbvz.rom (MC68VZ328 UART Bootloader)"
|
||||
firmware4_path = "bootloader-dbvz.rom"
|
||||
firmware4_opt = "true"
|
||||
|
||||
notes = "(!) palmos40-en-m500.rom (md5): f50e4d5e4d98dc831f2c34a9107651eb|(!) palmos41-en-m515.rom (md5): 83cb1d1c76e568b916dc2e7c0bf669f6|(!) palmos52-en-t3.rom (md5): de46ec84d9aabf655eabdf9b00a3845d|(!) bootloader-dbvz.rom (md5): 9da101cd2317830649a31f8fa46debec"
|
||||
notes = "(!) palmos41-en-m515.rom (md5): 83cb1d1c76e568b916dc2e7c0bf669f6"
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue