PR #9260 made the MsgAlert macros use lambdas so that local
constexpr variables can be added while keeping the ability to
return a boolean from the macros.
Unfortunately, C++17 forbids referring to structured bindings in lambda
captures. This is fixed in P1091R3 but we cannot rely on C++20 yet...
In CreateDescriptorSetLayouts(), one less dynamic binding is created when
bSupportsGeometryShaders=false. Reduce the dynamicOffsetCount argument by
one in that case. Avoids this validation error:
Attempting to bind 3 descriptorSets with 2 dynamic descriptors, but
dynamicOffsetCount is 3. It should exactly match the number of dynamic
descriptors. The Vulkan spec states: dynamicOffsetCount must be equal to
the total number of dynamic descriptors in pDescriptorSets
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Marek <jonathan@marek.ca>
[Applied clang-format]
Signed-off-by: Léo Lam <leo@leolam.fr>
Unfortunately, {fmt} allows passing too many arguments to a format call
without raising any runtime or compile-time error [1].
As this is a common source of bugs since we started migrating to {fmt},
this commit adds some custom logic to validate the number of
replacement fields in format strings in addition to {fmt}'s own checks.
[1] https://github.com/fmtlib/fmt/issues/492
We want to use positional arguments in translatable strings
that have more than one argument so that translators can change
the order of them, but the question is: Should we also use
positional arguments in translatable strings with only one
argument? I think it makes most sense that way, partially
so that translators don't even have to be aware of the
non-positional syntax and partially because "translatable
strings use positional arguments" is an easier rule for us
to remember than "transitional strings which have more than
one argument use positional arguments". But let me know if
you have a different opinion.
tr calls with more than one argument would have a 0x04 byte
in the returned string when no translation was found
(which always is the case when using Dolphin in English).
Adds an interface that uses fmt under the hood, which is much more
flexible than printf, particularly for localization purposes, given fmt
supports positional formatters in a cross-platform manner out of the box
with no configuration necessary.
This is already handled by SurfaceDestroyed. In the worst case,
the extra code could even race with SurfaceDestroyed if they
are triggered at the same time, but this is highly improbable.
Time for yet another new iteration of working around the
"surface destruction during boot" problem...
This time, the strategy is to use a mutex in MainAndroid.cpp.
Léo Lam