Jit64: really fix fmrx regression
This is more tricky than I thought!
This commit is contained in:
parent
011fe86d01
commit
ff91789773
|
@ -224,15 +224,26 @@ void Jit64::fmrx(UGeckoInstruction inst)
|
|||
{
|
||||
INSTRUCTION_START
|
||||
JITDISABLE(bJITFloatingPointOff)
|
||||
if (inst.Rc) {
|
||||
if (inst.Rc)
|
||||
{
|
||||
Default(inst); return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
int d = inst.FD;
|
||||
int b = inst.FB;
|
||||
if (d != b) {
|
||||
if (d != b)
|
||||
{
|
||||
fpr.Lock(b, d);
|
||||
|
||||
// we don't need to load d, but if it already is, it must be marked as dirty
|
||||
if (fpr.IsBound(d))
|
||||
{
|
||||
fpr.BindToRegister(d);
|
||||
MOVSD(fpr.RX(d), fpr.R(b));
|
||||
}
|
||||
fpr.BindToRegister(b, true, false);
|
||||
|
||||
// caveat: the order of ModRM:r/m, ModRM:reg is deliberate!
|
||||
// "MOVSD reg, mem" zeros out the upper half of the destination register
|
||||
MOVSD(fpr.R(d), fpr.RX(b));
|
||||
fpr.UnlockAll();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue