From 684b3dfd4a2053ff4afe6ace8c09105afd3a0eab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: JosJuice <josjuice@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2023 14:18:49 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] JitArm64: Don't fall back to interpreter on low DCBZ hack

I missed this in 16eb188f1d.
---
 Source/Core/Core/PowerPC/JitArm64/JitArm64_LoadStore.cpp | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Source/Core/Core/PowerPC/JitArm64/JitArm64_LoadStore.cpp b/Source/Core/Core/PowerPC/JitArm64/JitArm64_LoadStore.cpp
index 1d8d3d1898..06d8d65b95 100644
--- a/Source/Core/Core/PowerPC/JitArm64/JitArm64_LoadStore.cpp
+++ b/Source/Core/Core/PowerPC/JitArm64/JitArm64_LoadStore.cpp
@@ -939,7 +939,6 @@ void JitArm64::dcbz(UGeckoInstruction inst)
 {
   INSTRUCTION_START
   JITDISABLE(bJITLoadStoreOff);
-  FALLBACK_IF(m_low_dcbz_hack);
 
   int a = inst.RA, b = inst.RB;