JitArm64_Integer: Optimize subfic for -1
Another one backported from x86. Not sure why I didn't do this in #12891 already. - Without carry Before: 0x2a3a03fb mvn w27, w26 0x6b1a037b subs w27, w27, w26 After: 0x1280001b mov w27, #-0x1 ; =-1 - With carry Before: 0x2a3b03f7 mvn w23, w27 0x6b1b02f7 subs w23, w23, w27 0x1a9f37f6 cset w22, hs 0x390bd3b6 strb w22, [x29, #0x2f4] After: 0x12800017 mov w23, #-0x1 ; =-1
This commit is contained in:
parent
ada646a795
commit
d81213c4a5
|
@ -1394,23 +1394,34 @@ void JitArm64::subfic(UGeckoInstruction inst)
|
|||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
const bool will_read = d == a;
|
||||
const bool is_zero = imm == 0;
|
||||
gpr.BindToRegister(d, will_read);
|
||||
|
||||
// d = imm - a
|
||||
ARM64Reg RD = gpr.R(d);
|
||||
|
||||
if (imm == -1)
|
||||
{
|
||||
Arm64GPRCache::ScopedARM64Reg WA(ARM64Reg::WZR);
|
||||
if (!is_zero)
|
||||
// d = -1 - a = ~a
|
||||
MVN(RD, gpr.R(a));
|
||||
// CA is always set in this case
|
||||
ComputeCarry(true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
const bool is_zero = imm == 0;
|
||||
|
||||
// d = imm - a
|
||||
{
|
||||
WA = will_read ? gpr.GetScopedReg() : Arm64GPRCache::ScopedARM64Reg(RD);
|
||||
MOVI2R(WA, imm);
|
||||
Arm64GPRCache::ScopedARM64Reg WA(ARM64Reg::WZR);
|
||||
if (!is_zero)
|
||||
{
|
||||
WA = will_read ? gpr.GetScopedReg() : Arm64GPRCache::ScopedARM64Reg(RD);
|
||||
MOVI2R(WA, imm);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
CARRY_IF_NEEDED(SUB, SUBS, RD, WA, gpr.R(a));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
CARRY_IF_NEEDED(SUB, SUBS, RD, WA, gpr.R(a));
|
||||
ComputeCarry();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ComputeCarry();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue