JitCache: Extract ErasePhysicalRange as function.

This commit is contained in:
degasus 2017-01-23 20:32:27 +01:00
parent 70caf447b9
commit 7f6b8e3555
2 changed files with 49 additions and 42 deletions

View File

@ -36,9 +36,10 @@ static void ClearCacheThreadSafe(u64 userdata, s64 cyclesdata)
JitInterface::ClearCache();
}
bool JitBlock::Overlap(u32 addr, u32 length)
bool JitBlock::OverlapsPhysicalRange(u32 address, u32 length) const
{
return physical_addresses.lower_bound(addr) != physical_addresses.lower_bound(addr + length);
return physical_addresses.lower_bound(address) !=
physical_addresses.lower_bound(address + length);
}
JitBaseBlockCache::JitBaseBlockCache(JitBase& jit) : m_jit{jit}
@ -182,7 +183,7 @@ const u8* JitBaseBlockCache::Dispatch()
return block->normalEntry;
}
void JitBaseBlockCache::InvalidateICache(u32 address, const u32 length, bool forced)
void JitBaseBlockCache::InvalidateICache(u32 address, u32 length, bool forced)
{
auto translated = PowerPC::JitCache_TranslateAddress(address);
if (!translated.valid)
@ -199,13 +200,32 @@ void JitBaseBlockCache::InvalidateICache(u32 address, const u32 length, bool for
valid_block.Clear(pAddr / 32);
}
// destroy JIT blocks
if (destroy_block)
{
// destroy JIT blocks
ErasePhysicalRange(pAddr, length);
// If the code was actually modified, we need to clear the relevant entries from the
// FIFO write address cache, so we don't end up with FIFO checks in places they shouldn't
// be (this can clobber flags, and thus break any optimization that relies on flags
// being in the right place between instructions).
if (!forced)
{
for (u32 i = address; i < address + length; i += 4)
{
m_jit.js.fifoWriteAddresses.erase(i);
m_jit.js.pairedQuantizeAddresses.erase(i);
}
}
}
}
void JitBaseBlockCache::ErasePhysicalRange(u32 address, u32 length)
{
// Iterate over all macro blocks which overlap the given range.
u32 range_mask = ~(BLOCK_RANGE_MAP_ELEMENTS - 1);
auto start = block_range_map.lower_bound(pAddr & range_mask);
auto end = block_range_map.lower_bound(pAddr + length);
auto start = block_range_map.lower_bound(address & range_mask);
auto end = block_range_map.lower_bound(address + length);
while (start != end)
{
// Iterate over all blocks in the macro block.
@ -213,7 +233,7 @@ void JitBaseBlockCache::InvalidateICache(u32 address, const u32 length, bool for
while (iter != start->second.end())
{
JitBlock* block = *iter;
if (block->Overlap(pAddr, length))
if (block->OverlapsPhysicalRange(address, length))
{
// If the block overlaps, also remove all other occupied slots in the other macro blocks.
// This will leak empty macro blocks, but they may be reused or cleared later on.
@ -238,20 +258,6 @@ void JitBaseBlockCache::InvalidateICache(u32 address, const u32 length, bool for
else
start++;
}
// If the code was actually modified, we need to clear the relevant entries from the
// FIFO write address cache, so we don't end up with FIFO checks in places they shouldn't
// be (this can clobber flags, and thus break any optimization that relies on flags
// being in the right place between instructions).
if (!forced)
{
for (u32 i = address; i < address + length; i += 4)
{
m_jit.js.fifoWriteAddresses.erase(i);
m_jit.js.pairedQuantizeAddresses.erase(i);
}
}
}
}
u32* JitBaseBlockCache::GetBlockBitSet() const

View File

@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ class JitBase;
// address.
struct JitBlock
{
bool Overlap(u32 addr, u32 length);
bool OverlapsPhysicalRange(u32 address, u32 length) const;
// A special entry point for block linking; usually used to check the
// downcount.
@ -143,7 +143,8 @@ public:
// assembly version.)
const u8* Dispatch();
void InvalidateICache(u32 address, const u32 length, bool forced);
void InvalidateICache(u32 address, u32 length, bool forced);
void ErasePhysicalRange(u32 address, u32 length);
u32* GetBlockBitSet() const;