Jit: Check for discarded registers when flushing
This adds a check for the bug addressed by the previous commit.
This commit is contained in:
parent
5902b5b113
commit
34b0a6ea90
|
@ -421,7 +421,9 @@ void RegCache::Flush(BitSet32 pregs)
|
|||
switch (m_regs[i].GetLocationType())
|
||||
{
|
||||
case PPCCachedReg::LocationType::Default:
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case PPCCachedReg::LocationType::Discarded:
|
||||
ASSERT_MSG(DYNA_REC, false, "Attempted to flush discarded PPC reg {}", i);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case PPCCachedReg::LocationType::SpeculativeImmediate:
|
||||
// We can have a cached value without a host register through speculative constants.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -245,11 +245,14 @@ void Arm64GPRCache::FlushRegisters(BitSet32 regs, bool maintain_state, ARM64Reg
|
|||
{
|
||||
if (regs[i])
|
||||
{
|
||||
ASSERT_MSG(DYNA_REC, m_guest_registers[GUEST_GPR_OFFSET + i].GetType() != RegType::Discarded,
|
||||
"Attempted to flush discarded register");
|
||||
|
||||
if (i + 1 < GUEST_GPR_COUNT && regs[i + 1])
|
||||
{
|
||||
// We've got two guest registers in a row to store
|
||||
OpArg& reg1 = m_guest_registers[i];
|
||||
OpArg& reg2 = m_guest_registers[i + 1];
|
||||
OpArg& reg1 = m_guest_registers[GUEST_GPR_OFFSET + i];
|
||||
OpArg& reg2 = m_guest_registers[GUEST_GPR_OFFSET + i + 1];
|
||||
if (reg1.IsDirty() && reg2.IsDirty() && reg1.GetType() == RegType::Register &&
|
||||
reg2.GetType() == RegType::Register)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -283,6 +286,9 @@ void Arm64GPRCache::FlushCRRegisters(BitSet32 regs, bool maintain_state, ARM64Re
|
|||
{
|
||||
if (regs[i])
|
||||
{
|
||||
ASSERT_MSG(DYNA_REC, m_guest_registers[GUEST_CR_OFFSET + i].GetType() != RegType::Discarded,
|
||||
"Attempted to flush discarded register");
|
||||
|
||||
FlushRegister(GUEST_CR_OFFSET + i, maintain_state, tmp_reg);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue