byuu says:
Changelog:
- nall: `#undef OUT` on Windows platform
- GBA: add missing CPU prefetch state to serialization (this was
breaking serialization in games using ROM prefetch)
- GBA: reset all PPU data in the power() function (some things were
missing before, causing issues on reset)
- GBA: restored horizontal mosaic emulation to the new pixel-based
renderer
- GBA: fixed tilemap background horizontal flipping (Legend of Spyro -
warning screen)
- GBA: fixed d8 bits of scroll registers (ATV - Thunder Ridge Racers -
menu screen)
- SFC: DRAM refresh ticks the ALU MUL/DIV registers five steps forward
[reported by kevtris]
- SFC: merged dmaCounter and autoJoypadCounter into new shared
clockCounter
- left stub for old dmaCounter so that I can do some traces to
ensure the new code's 100% identical
GBA save states would have been broken since whenever I emulated ROM
prefetch. I guess not many people are using the GBA core ...
byuu says:
Note: add `#undef OUT` to the top of higan/gba/ppu/ppu.hpp to compile on
Windows (ugh ...) Now to await posts about this in four more threads
again ;)
Changelog:
- GBA: rewrote PPU from a scanline-based renderer to a pixel-based
renderer
- ruby: fixed video/gdi bugs
Note that there's an approximately 21% speed penalty compared to v102r18
for the pixel-based renderer.
Also, horizontal mosaic effects are not yet implemented. But they should
be prior to v103. This one is a little tricky as it currently works on
fully rendered scanlines. I need to roll the mosaic into the background
renderers, and then for sprites, well ... see below.
The trickiest part by far of this new renderer is the object (sprite)
system. Unlike every other system I emulate, the GBA supports affine
rendering of its sprites. Or in other words, rotation effects. And it
also has a very complex priority system.
Right now, I can't see any way that the GBA PPU could render pixels in
real-time like this. My belief is that there's a 240-entry buffer that
fills up the next scanline's row of pixels. Which means it probably also
runs on the last scanline of Vblank so that the first scanline has
sprite data.
However, I didn't design my object renderer like this just yet. For now,
it creates a buffer of all 240 pixels right away at the start of the
scanline. I know\!\! That's technically scanline-based. But it's only
for fetching object tiledata, and it's only temporary.
What needs to happen is I need a way to run something like a "mini libco
thread" inside of the main thread, so that the object renderer can run
in parallel with the rest of the PPU, yet not be a hideous abomination
of a state machine, yet also not be horrendously slow as a full libco
thread would be.
I'm envisioning some kind of stackless yielding coroutine. But I'll need
to think through how to design that, given the absence of coroutines
even in C++17.
byuu says:
Changelog:
- GB core code cleanup completed
- GBA core code cleanup completed
- some more cleanup on missed processor/arm functions/variables
- fixed FC loading icarus bug
- "Load ROM File" icarus functionality restored
- minor code unification efforts all around (not perfect yet)
- MMIO->IO
- mmio.cpp->io.cpp
- read,write->readIO,writeIO
It's been a very long work in progress ... starting all the way back with
v094r09, but the major part of the higan code cleanup is now completed! Of
course, it's very important to note that this is only for the basic style:
- under_score functions and variables are now camelCase
- return-type function-name() are now auto function-name() -> return-type
- Natural<T>/Integer<T> replace (u)intT_n types where possible
- signed/unsigned are now int/uint
- most of the x==true,x==false tests changed to x,!x
A lot of spot improvements to consistency, simplicity and quality have
gone in along the way, of course. But we'll probably never fully finishing
beautifying every last line of code in the entire codebase. Still,
this is a really great start. Going forward, WIP diffs should start
being smaller and of higher quality once again.
I know the joke is, "until my coding style changes again", but ... this
was way too stressful, way too time consuming, and way too risky. I'm
too old and tired now for extreme upheavel like this again. The only
major change I'm slowly mulling over would be renaming the using
Natural<T>/Integer<T> = (u)intT; shorthand to something that isn't as
easily confused with the (u)int_t types ... but we'll see. I'll definitely
continue to change small things all the time, but for the larger picture,
I need to just accept the style I have and live with it.
Tim Allen