bsnes/higan/gba/ppu/ppu.cpp

144 lines
3.0 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

#include <gba/gba.hpp>
//pixel: 4 cycles
//hdraw: 240 pixels ( 960 cycles)
//hblank: 68 pixels ( 272 cycles)
//scanline: 308 pixels (1232 cycles)
//vdraw: 160 scanlines (197120 cycles)
//vblank: 68 scanlines ( 83776 cycles)
//frame: 228 scanlines (280896 cycles)
namespace GameBoyAdvance {
PPU ppu;
#include "background.cpp"
#include "object.cpp"
Update to v102r19 release. byuu says: Note: add `#undef OUT` to the top of higan/gba/ppu/ppu.hpp to compile on Windows (ugh ...) Now to await posts about this in four more threads again ;) Changelog: - GBA: rewrote PPU from a scanline-based renderer to a pixel-based renderer - ruby: fixed video/gdi bugs Note that there's an approximately 21% speed penalty compared to v102r18 for the pixel-based renderer. Also, horizontal mosaic effects are not yet implemented. But they should be prior to v103. This one is a little tricky as it currently works on fully rendered scanlines. I need to roll the mosaic into the background renderers, and then for sprites, well ... see below. The trickiest part by far of this new renderer is the object (sprite) system. Unlike every other system I emulate, the GBA supports affine rendering of its sprites. Or in other words, rotation effects. And it also has a very complex priority system. Right now, I can't see any way that the GBA PPU could render pixels in real-time like this. My belief is that there's a 240-entry buffer that fills up the next scanline's row of pixels. Which means it probably also runs on the last scanline of Vblank so that the first scanline has sprite data. However, I didn't design my object renderer like this just yet. For now, it creates a buffer of all 240 pixels right away at the start of the scanline. I know\!\! That's technically scanline-based. But it's only for fetching object tiledata, and it's only temporary. What needs to happen is I need a way to run something like a "mini libco thread" inside of the main thread, so that the object renderer can run in parallel with the rest of the PPU, yet not be a hideous abomination of a state machine, yet also not be horrendously slow as a full libco thread would be. I'm envisioning some kind of stackless yielding coroutine. But I'll need to think through how to design that, given the absence of coroutines even in C++17.
2017-06-04 03:16:44 +00:00
#include "window.cpp"
#include "screen.cpp"
Update to v099r13 release. byuu says: Changelog: - GB core code cleanup completed - GBA core code cleanup completed - some more cleanup on missed processor/arm functions/variables - fixed FC loading icarus bug - "Load ROM File" icarus functionality restored - minor code unification efforts all around (not perfect yet) - MMIO->IO - mmio.cpp->io.cpp - read,write->readIO,writeIO It's been a very long work in progress ... starting all the way back with v094r09, but the major part of the higan code cleanup is now completed! Of course, it's very important to note that this is only for the basic style: - under_score functions and variables are now camelCase - return-type function-name() are now auto function-name() -> return-type - Natural<T>/Integer<T> replace (u)intT_n types where possible - signed/unsigned are now int/uint - most of the x==true,x==false tests changed to x,!x A lot of spot improvements to consistency, simplicity and quality have gone in along the way, of course. But we'll probably never fully finishing beautifying every last line of code in the entire codebase. Still, this is a really great start. Going forward, WIP diffs should start being smaller and of higher quality once again. I know the joke is, "until my coding style changes again", but ... this was way too stressful, way too time consuming, and way too risky. I'm too old and tired now for extreme upheavel like this again. The only major change I'm slowly mulling over would be renaming the using Natural<T>/Integer<T> = (u)intT; shorthand to something that isn't as easily confused with the (u)int_t types ... but we'll see. I'll definitely continue to change small things all the time, but for the larger picture, I need to just accept the style I have and live with it.
2016-06-29 11:10:28 +00:00
#include "io.cpp"
#include "memory.cpp"
#include "serialization.cpp"
Update to v102r19 release. byuu says: Note: add `#undef OUT` to the top of higan/gba/ppu/ppu.hpp to compile on Windows (ugh ...) Now to await posts about this in four more threads again ;) Changelog: - GBA: rewrote PPU from a scanline-based renderer to a pixel-based renderer - ruby: fixed video/gdi bugs Note that there's an approximately 21% speed penalty compared to v102r18 for the pixel-based renderer. Also, horizontal mosaic effects are not yet implemented. But they should be prior to v103. This one is a little tricky as it currently works on fully rendered scanlines. I need to roll the mosaic into the background renderers, and then for sprites, well ... see below. The trickiest part by far of this new renderer is the object (sprite) system. Unlike every other system I emulate, the GBA supports affine rendering of its sprites. Or in other words, rotation effects. And it also has a very complex priority system. Right now, I can't see any way that the GBA PPU could render pixels in real-time like this. My belief is that there's a 240-entry buffer that fills up the next scanline's row of pixels. Which means it probably also runs on the last scanline of Vblank so that the first scanline has sprite data. However, I didn't design my object renderer like this just yet. For now, it creates a buffer of all 240 pixels right away at the start of the scanline. I know\!\! That's technically scanline-based. But it's only for fetching object tiledata, and it's only temporary. What needs to happen is I need a way to run something like a "mini libco thread" inside of the main thread, so that the object renderer can run in parallel with the rest of the PPU, yet not be a hideous abomination of a state machine, yet also not be horrendously slow as a full libco thread would be. I'm envisioning some kind of stackless yielding coroutine. But I'll need to think through how to design that, given the absence of coroutines even in C++17.
2017-06-04 03:16:44 +00:00
auto PPU::blank() -> bool {
return io.forceBlank || cpu.regs.mode == CPU::Registers::Mode::Stop;
}
PPU::PPU() {
output = new uint32[240 * 160];
}
PPU::~PPU() {
delete[] output;
}
auto PPU::Enter() -> void {
while(true) scheduler.synchronize(), ppu.main();
}
auto PPU::step(uint clocks) -> void {
Update to v100r14 release. byuu says: (Windows: compile with -fpermissive to silence an annoying error. I'll fix it in the next WIP.) I completely replaced the time management system in higan and overhauled the scheduler. Before, processor threads would have "int64 clock"; and there would be a 1:1 relationship between two threads. When thread A ran for X cycles, it'd subtract X * B.Frequency from clock; and when thread B ran for Y cycles, it'd add Y * A.Frequency from clock. This worked well and allowed perfect precision; but it doesn't work when you have more complicated relationships: eg the 68K can sync to the Z80 and PSG; the Z80 to the 68K and PSG; so the PSG needs two counters. The new system instead uses a "uint64 clock" variable that represents time in attoseconds. Every time the scheduler exits, it subtracts the smallest clock count from all threads, to prevent an overflow scenario. The only real downside is that rounding errors mean that roughly every 20 minutes, we have a rounding error of one clock cycle (one 20,000,000th of a second.) However, this only applies to systems with multiple oscillators, like the SNES. And when you're in that situation ... there's no such thing as a perfect oscillator anyway. A real SNES will be thousands of times less out of spec than 1hz per 20 minutes. The advantages are pretty immense. First, we obviously can now support more complex relationships between threads. Second, we can build a much more abstracted scheduler. All of libco is now abstracted away completely, which may permit a state-machine / coroutine version of Thread in the future. We've basically gone from this: auto SMP::step(uint clocks) -> void { clock += clocks * (uint64)cpu.frequency; dsp.clock -= clocks; if(dsp.clock < 0 && !scheduler.synchronizing()) co_switch(dsp.thread); if(clock >= 0 && !scheduler.synchronizing()) co_switch(cpu.thread); } To this: auto SMP::step(uint clocks) -> void { Thread::step(clocks); synchronize(dsp); synchronize(cpu); } As you can see, we don't have to do multiple clock adjustments anymore. This is a huge win for the SNES CPU that had to update the SMP, DSP, all peripherals and all coprocessors. Likewise, we don't have to synchronize all coprocessors when one runs, now we can just synchronize the active one to the CPU. Third, when changing the frequencies of threads (think SGB speed setting modes, GBC double-speed mode, etc), it no longer causes the "int64 clock" value to be erroneous. Fourth, this results in a fairly decent speedup, mostly across the board. Aside from the GBA being mostly a wash (for unknown reasons), it's about an 8% - 12% speedup in every other emulation core. Now, all of this said ... this was an unbelievably massive change, so ... you know what that means >_> If anyone can help test all types of SNES coprocessors, and some other system games, it'd be appreciated. ---- Lastly, we have a bitchin' new about screen. It unfortunately adds ~200KiB onto the binary size, because the PNG->C++ header file transformation doesn't compress very well, and I want to keep the original resource files in with the higan archive. I might try some things to work around this file size increase in the future, but for now ... yeah, slightly larger archive sizes, sorry. The logo's a bit busted on Windows (the Label control's background transparency and alignment settings aren't working), but works well on GTK. I'll have to fix Windows before the next official release. For now, look on my Twitter feed if you want to see what it's supposed to look like. ---- EDIT: forgot about ICD2::Enter. It's doing some weird inverse run-to-save thing that I need to implement support for somehow. So, save states on the SGB core probably won't work with this WIP.
2016-07-30 03:56:12 +00:00
Thread::step(clocks);
synchronize(cpu);
}
Update to v102r19 release. byuu says: Note: add `#undef OUT` to the top of higan/gba/ppu/ppu.hpp to compile on Windows (ugh ...) Now to await posts about this in four more threads again ;) Changelog: - GBA: rewrote PPU from a scanline-based renderer to a pixel-based renderer - ruby: fixed video/gdi bugs Note that there's an approximately 21% speed penalty compared to v102r18 for the pixel-based renderer. Also, horizontal mosaic effects are not yet implemented. But they should be prior to v103. This one is a little tricky as it currently works on fully rendered scanlines. I need to roll the mosaic into the background renderers, and then for sprites, well ... see below. The trickiest part by far of this new renderer is the object (sprite) system. Unlike every other system I emulate, the GBA supports affine rendering of its sprites. Or in other words, rotation effects. And it also has a very complex priority system. Right now, I can't see any way that the GBA PPU could render pixels in real-time like this. My belief is that there's a 240-entry buffer that fills up the next scanline's row of pixels. Which means it probably also runs on the last scanline of Vblank so that the first scanline has sprite data. However, I didn't design my object renderer like this just yet. For now, it creates a buffer of all 240 pixels right away at the start of the scanline. I know\!\! That's technically scanline-based. But it's only for fetching object tiledata, and it's only temporary. What needs to happen is I need a way to run something like a "mini libco thread" inside of the main thread, so that the object renderer can run in parallel with the rest of the PPU, yet not be a hideous abomination of a state machine, yet also not be horrendously slow as a full libco thread would be. I'm envisioning some kind of stackless yielding coroutine. But I'll need to think through how to design that, given the absence of coroutines even in C++17.
2017-06-04 03:16:44 +00:00
auto PPU::main() -> void {
Update to v099r13 release. byuu says: Changelog: - GB core code cleanup completed - GBA core code cleanup completed - some more cleanup on missed processor/arm functions/variables - fixed FC loading icarus bug - "Load ROM File" icarus functionality restored - minor code unification efforts all around (not perfect yet) - MMIO->IO - mmio.cpp->io.cpp - read,write->readIO,writeIO It's been a very long work in progress ... starting all the way back with v094r09, but the major part of the higan code cleanup is now completed! Of course, it's very important to note that this is only for the basic style: - under_score functions and variables are now camelCase - return-type function-name() are now auto function-name() -> return-type - Natural<T>/Integer<T> replace (u)intT_n types where possible - signed/unsigned are now int/uint - most of the x==true,x==false tests changed to x,!x A lot of spot improvements to consistency, simplicity and quality have gone in along the way, of course. But we'll probably never fully finishing beautifying every last line of code in the entire codebase. Still, this is a really great start. Going forward, WIP diffs should start being smaller and of higher quality once again. I know the joke is, "until my coding style changes again", but ... this was way too stressful, way too time consuming, and way too risky. I'm too old and tired now for extreme upheavel like this again. The only major change I'm slowly mulling over would be renaming the using Natural<T>/Integer<T> = (u)intT; shorthand to something that isn't as easily confused with the (u)int_t types ... but we'll see. I'll definitely continue to change small things all the time, but for the larger picture, I need to just accept the style I have and live with it.
2016-06-29 11:10:28 +00:00
cpu.keypadRun();
Update to v102r19 release. byuu says: Note: add `#undef OUT` to the top of higan/gba/ppu/ppu.hpp to compile on Windows (ugh ...) Now to await posts about this in four more threads again ;) Changelog: - GBA: rewrote PPU from a scanline-based renderer to a pixel-based renderer - ruby: fixed video/gdi bugs Note that there's an approximately 21% speed penalty compared to v102r18 for the pixel-based renderer. Also, horizontal mosaic effects are not yet implemented. But they should be prior to v103. This one is a little tricky as it currently works on fully rendered scanlines. I need to roll the mosaic into the background renderers, and then for sprites, well ... see below. The trickiest part by far of this new renderer is the object (sprite) system. Unlike every other system I emulate, the GBA supports affine rendering of its sprites. Or in other words, rotation effects. And it also has a very complex priority system. Right now, I can't see any way that the GBA PPU could render pixels in real-time like this. My belief is that there's a 240-entry buffer that fills up the next scanline's row of pixels. Which means it probably also runs on the last scanline of Vblank so that the first scanline has sprite data. However, I didn't design my object renderer like this just yet. For now, it creates a buffer of all 240 pixels right away at the start of the scanline. I know\!\! That's technically scanline-based. But it's only for fetching object tiledata, and it's only temporary. What needs to happen is I need a way to run something like a "mini libco thread" inside of the main thread, so that the object renderer can run in parallel with the rest of the PPU, yet not be a hideous abomination of a state machine, yet also not be horrendously slow as a full libco thread would be. I'm envisioning some kind of stackless yielding coroutine. But I'll need to think through how to design that, given the absence of coroutines even in C++17.
2017-06-04 03:16:44 +00:00
io.vblank = io.vcounter >= 160 && io.vcounter <= 226;
io.vcoincidence = io.vcounter == io.vcompare;
if(io.vcounter == 0) {
frame();
Update to v102r19 release. byuu says: Note: add `#undef OUT` to the top of higan/gba/ppu/ppu.hpp to compile on Windows (ugh ...) Now to await posts about this in four more threads again ;) Changelog: - GBA: rewrote PPU from a scanline-based renderer to a pixel-based renderer - ruby: fixed video/gdi bugs Note that there's an approximately 21% speed penalty compared to v102r18 for the pixel-based renderer. Also, horizontal mosaic effects are not yet implemented. But they should be prior to v103. This one is a little tricky as it currently works on fully rendered scanlines. I need to roll the mosaic into the background renderers, and then for sprites, well ... see below. The trickiest part by far of this new renderer is the object (sprite) system. Unlike every other system I emulate, the GBA supports affine rendering of its sprites. Or in other words, rotation effects. And it also has a very complex priority system. Right now, I can't see any way that the GBA PPU could render pixels in real-time like this. My belief is that there's a 240-entry buffer that fills up the next scanline's row of pixels. Which means it probably also runs on the last scanline of Vblank so that the first scanline has sprite data. However, I didn't design my object renderer like this just yet. For now, it creates a buffer of all 240 pixels right away at the start of the scanline. I know\!\! That's technically scanline-based. But it's only for fetching object tiledata, and it's only temporary. What needs to happen is I need a way to run something like a "mini libco thread" inside of the main thread, so that the object renderer can run in parallel with the rest of the PPU, yet not be a hideous abomination of a state machine, yet also not be horrendously slow as a full libco thread would be. I'm envisioning some kind of stackless yielding coroutine. But I'll need to think through how to design that, given the absence of coroutines even in C++17.
2017-06-04 03:16:44 +00:00
bg2.io.lx = bg2.io.x;
bg2.io.ly = bg2.io.y;
Update to v102r19 release. byuu says: Note: add `#undef OUT` to the top of higan/gba/ppu/ppu.hpp to compile on Windows (ugh ...) Now to await posts about this in four more threads again ;) Changelog: - GBA: rewrote PPU from a scanline-based renderer to a pixel-based renderer - ruby: fixed video/gdi bugs Note that there's an approximately 21% speed penalty compared to v102r18 for the pixel-based renderer. Also, horizontal mosaic effects are not yet implemented. But they should be prior to v103. This one is a little tricky as it currently works on fully rendered scanlines. I need to roll the mosaic into the background renderers, and then for sprites, well ... see below. The trickiest part by far of this new renderer is the object (sprite) system. Unlike every other system I emulate, the GBA supports affine rendering of its sprites. Or in other words, rotation effects. And it also has a very complex priority system. Right now, I can't see any way that the GBA PPU could render pixels in real-time like this. My belief is that there's a 240-entry buffer that fills up the next scanline's row of pixels. Which means it probably also runs on the last scanline of Vblank so that the first scanline has sprite data. However, I didn't design my object renderer like this just yet. For now, it creates a buffer of all 240 pixels right away at the start of the scanline. I know\!\! That's technically scanline-based. But it's only for fetching object tiledata, and it's only temporary. What needs to happen is I need a way to run something like a "mini libco thread" inside of the main thread, so that the object renderer can run in parallel with the rest of the PPU, yet not be a hideous abomination of a state machine, yet also not be horrendously slow as a full libco thread would be. I'm envisioning some kind of stackless yielding coroutine. But I'll need to think through how to design that, given the absence of coroutines even in C++17.
2017-06-04 03:16:44 +00:00
bg3.io.lx = bg3.io.x;
bg3.io.ly = bg3.io.y;
}
Update to v102r19 release. byuu says: Note: add `#undef OUT` to the top of higan/gba/ppu/ppu.hpp to compile on Windows (ugh ...) Now to await posts about this in four more threads again ;) Changelog: - GBA: rewrote PPU from a scanline-based renderer to a pixel-based renderer - ruby: fixed video/gdi bugs Note that there's an approximately 21% speed penalty compared to v102r18 for the pixel-based renderer. Also, horizontal mosaic effects are not yet implemented. But they should be prior to v103. This one is a little tricky as it currently works on fully rendered scanlines. I need to roll the mosaic into the background renderers, and then for sprites, well ... see below. The trickiest part by far of this new renderer is the object (sprite) system. Unlike every other system I emulate, the GBA supports affine rendering of its sprites. Or in other words, rotation effects. And it also has a very complex priority system. Right now, I can't see any way that the GBA PPU could render pixels in real-time like this. My belief is that there's a 240-entry buffer that fills up the next scanline's row of pixels. Which means it probably also runs on the last scanline of Vblank so that the first scanline has sprite data. However, I didn't design my object renderer like this just yet. For now, it creates a buffer of all 240 pixels right away at the start of the scanline. I know\!\! That's technically scanline-based. But it's only for fetching object tiledata, and it's only temporary. What needs to happen is I need a way to run something like a "mini libco thread" inside of the main thread, so that the object renderer can run in parallel with the rest of the PPU, yet not be a hideous abomination of a state machine, yet also not be horrendously slow as a full libco thread would be. I'm envisioning some kind of stackless yielding coroutine. But I'll need to think through how to design that, given the absence of coroutines even in C++17.
2017-06-04 03:16:44 +00:00
if(io.vcounter == 160) {
if(io.irqvblank) cpu.regs.irq.flag |= CPU::Interrupt::VBlank;
Update to v099r13 release. byuu says: Changelog: - GB core code cleanup completed - GBA core code cleanup completed - some more cleanup on missed processor/arm functions/variables - fixed FC loading icarus bug - "Load ROM File" icarus functionality restored - minor code unification efforts all around (not perfect yet) - MMIO->IO - mmio.cpp->io.cpp - read,write->readIO,writeIO It's been a very long work in progress ... starting all the way back with v094r09, but the major part of the higan code cleanup is now completed! Of course, it's very important to note that this is only for the basic style: - under_score functions and variables are now camelCase - return-type function-name() are now auto function-name() -> return-type - Natural<T>/Integer<T> replace (u)intT_n types where possible - signed/unsigned are now int/uint - most of the x==true,x==false tests changed to x,!x A lot of spot improvements to consistency, simplicity and quality have gone in along the way, of course. But we'll probably never fully finishing beautifying every last line of code in the entire codebase. Still, this is a really great start. Going forward, WIP diffs should start being smaller and of higher quality once again. I know the joke is, "until my coding style changes again", but ... this was way too stressful, way too time consuming, and way too risky. I'm too old and tired now for extreme upheavel like this again. The only major change I'm slowly mulling over would be renaming the using Natural<T>/Integer<T> = (u)intT; shorthand to something that isn't as easily confused with the (u)int_t types ... but we'll see. I'll definitely continue to change small things all the time, but for the larger picture, I need to just accept the style I have and live with it.
2016-06-29 11:10:28 +00:00
cpu.dmaVblank();
}
Update to v102r19 release. byuu says: Note: add `#undef OUT` to the top of higan/gba/ppu/ppu.hpp to compile on Windows (ugh ...) Now to await posts about this in four more threads again ;) Changelog: - GBA: rewrote PPU from a scanline-based renderer to a pixel-based renderer - ruby: fixed video/gdi bugs Note that there's an approximately 21% speed penalty compared to v102r18 for the pixel-based renderer. Also, horizontal mosaic effects are not yet implemented. But they should be prior to v103. This one is a little tricky as it currently works on fully rendered scanlines. I need to roll the mosaic into the background renderers, and then for sprites, well ... see below. The trickiest part by far of this new renderer is the object (sprite) system. Unlike every other system I emulate, the GBA supports affine rendering of its sprites. Or in other words, rotation effects. And it also has a very complex priority system. Right now, I can't see any way that the GBA PPU could render pixels in real-time like this. My belief is that there's a 240-entry buffer that fills up the next scanline's row of pixels. Which means it probably also runs on the last scanline of Vblank so that the first scanline has sprite data. However, I didn't design my object renderer like this just yet. For now, it creates a buffer of all 240 pixels right away at the start of the scanline. I know\!\! That's technically scanline-based. But it's only for fetching object tiledata, and it's only temporary. What needs to happen is I need a way to run something like a "mini libco thread" inside of the main thread, so that the object renderer can run in parallel with the rest of the PPU, yet not be a hideous abomination of a state machine, yet also not be horrendously slow as a full libco thread would be. I'm envisioning some kind of stackless yielding coroutine. But I'll need to think through how to design that, given the absence of coroutines even in C++17.
2017-06-04 03:16:44 +00:00
if(io.irqvcoincidence) {
if(io.vcoincidence) cpu.regs.irq.flag |= CPU::Interrupt::VCoincidence;
}
Update to v102r19 release. byuu says: Note: add `#undef OUT` to the top of higan/gba/ppu/ppu.hpp to compile on Windows (ugh ...) Now to await posts about this in four more threads again ;) Changelog: - GBA: rewrote PPU from a scanline-based renderer to a pixel-based renderer - ruby: fixed video/gdi bugs Note that there's an approximately 21% speed penalty compared to v102r18 for the pixel-based renderer. Also, horizontal mosaic effects are not yet implemented. But they should be prior to v103. This one is a little tricky as it currently works on fully rendered scanlines. I need to roll the mosaic into the background renderers, and then for sprites, well ... see below. The trickiest part by far of this new renderer is the object (sprite) system. Unlike every other system I emulate, the GBA supports affine rendering of its sprites. Or in other words, rotation effects. And it also has a very complex priority system. Right now, I can't see any way that the GBA PPU could render pixels in real-time like this. My belief is that there's a 240-entry buffer that fills up the next scanline's row of pixels. Which means it probably also runs on the last scanline of Vblank so that the first scanline has sprite data. However, I didn't design my object renderer like this just yet. For now, it creates a buffer of all 240 pixels right away at the start of the scanline. I know\!\! That's technically scanline-based. But it's only for fetching object tiledata, and it's only temporary. What needs to happen is I need a way to run something like a "mini libco thread" inside of the main thread, so that the object renderer can run in parallel with the rest of the PPU, yet not be a hideous abomination of a state machine, yet also not be horrendously slow as a full libco thread would be. I'm envisioning some kind of stackless yielding coroutine. But I'll need to think through how to design that, given the absence of coroutines even in C++17.
2017-06-04 03:16:44 +00:00
if(io.vcounter < 160) {
uint y = io.vcounter;
bg0.scanline(y);
bg1.scanline(y);
bg2.scanline(y);
bg3.scanline(y);
objects.scanline(y);
for(uint x : range(240)) {
bg0.run(x, y);
bg1.run(x, y);
bg2.run(x, y);
bg3.run(x, y);
objects.run(x, y);
window0.run(x, y);
window1.run(x, y);
window2.output = objects.output.window;
window3.output = true;
uint15 color = screen.run(x, y);
output[y * 240 + x] = color;
step(4);
}
Update to v102r19 release. byuu says: Note: add `#undef OUT` to the top of higan/gba/ppu/ppu.hpp to compile on Windows (ugh ...) Now to await posts about this in four more threads again ;) Changelog: - GBA: rewrote PPU from a scanline-based renderer to a pixel-based renderer - ruby: fixed video/gdi bugs Note that there's an approximately 21% speed penalty compared to v102r18 for the pixel-based renderer. Also, horizontal mosaic effects are not yet implemented. But they should be prior to v103. This one is a little tricky as it currently works on fully rendered scanlines. I need to roll the mosaic into the background renderers, and then for sprites, well ... see below. The trickiest part by far of this new renderer is the object (sprite) system. Unlike every other system I emulate, the GBA supports affine rendering of its sprites. Or in other words, rotation effects. And it also has a very complex priority system. Right now, I can't see any way that the GBA PPU could render pixels in real-time like this. My belief is that there's a 240-entry buffer that fills up the next scanline's row of pixels. Which means it probably also runs on the last scanline of Vblank so that the first scanline has sprite data. However, I didn't design my object renderer like this just yet. For now, it creates a buffer of all 240 pixels right away at the start of the scanline. I know\!\! That's technically scanline-based. But it's only for fetching object tiledata, and it's only temporary. What needs to happen is I need a way to run something like a "mini libco thread" inside of the main thread, so that the object renderer can run in parallel with the rest of the PPU, yet not be a hideous abomination of a state machine, yet also not be horrendously slow as a full libco thread would be. I'm envisioning some kind of stackless yielding coroutine. But I'll need to think through how to design that, given the absence of coroutines even in C++17.
2017-06-04 03:16:44 +00:00
} else {
step(960);
}
Update to v102r19 release. byuu says: Note: add `#undef OUT` to the top of higan/gba/ppu/ppu.hpp to compile on Windows (ugh ...) Now to await posts about this in four more threads again ;) Changelog: - GBA: rewrote PPU from a scanline-based renderer to a pixel-based renderer - ruby: fixed video/gdi bugs Note that there's an approximately 21% speed penalty compared to v102r18 for the pixel-based renderer. Also, horizontal mosaic effects are not yet implemented. But they should be prior to v103. This one is a little tricky as it currently works on fully rendered scanlines. I need to roll the mosaic into the background renderers, and then for sprites, well ... see below. The trickiest part by far of this new renderer is the object (sprite) system. Unlike every other system I emulate, the GBA supports affine rendering of its sprites. Or in other words, rotation effects. And it also has a very complex priority system. Right now, I can't see any way that the GBA PPU could render pixels in real-time like this. My belief is that there's a 240-entry buffer that fills up the next scanline's row of pixels. Which means it probably also runs on the last scanline of Vblank so that the first scanline has sprite data. However, I didn't design my object renderer like this just yet. For now, it creates a buffer of all 240 pixels right away at the start of the scanline. I know\!\! That's technically scanline-based. But it's only for fetching object tiledata, and it's only temporary. What needs to happen is I need a way to run something like a "mini libco thread" inside of the main thread, so that the object renderer can run in parallel with the rest of the PPU, yet not be a hideous abomination of a state machine, yet also not be horrendously slow as a full libco thread would be. I'm envisioning some kind of stackless yielding coroutine. But I'll need to think through how to design that, given the absence of coroutines even in C++17.
2017-06-04 03:16:44 +00:00
io.hblank = 1;
if(io.irqhblank) cpu.regs.irq.flag |= CPU::Interrupt::HBlank;
if(io.vcounter < 160) cpu.dmaHblank();
step(240);
Update to v102r19 release. byuu says: Note: add `#undef OUT` to the top of higan/gba/ppu/ppu.hpp to compile on Windows (ugh ...) Now to await posts about this in four more threads again ;) Changelog: - GBA: rewrote PPU from a scanline-based renderer to a pixel-based renderer - ruby: fixed video/gdi bugs Note that there's an approximately 21% speed penalty compared to v102r18 for the pixel-based renderer. Also, horizontal mosaic effects are not yet implemented. But they should be prior to v103. This one is a little tricky as it currently works on fully rendered scanlines. I need to roll the mosaic into the background renderers, and then for sprites, well ... see below. The trickiest part by far of this new renderer is the object (sprite) system. Unlike every other system I emulate, the GBA supports affine rendering of its sprites. Or in other words, rotation effects. And it also has a very complex priority system. Right now, I can't see any way that the GBA PPU could render pixels in real-time like this. My belief is that there's a 240-entry buffer that fills up the next scanline's row of pixels. Which means it probably also runs on the last scanline of Vblank so that the first scanline has sprite data. However, I didn't design my object renderer like this just yet. For now, it creates a buffer of all 240 pixels right away at the start of the scanline. I know\!\! That's technically scanline-based. But it's only for fetching object tiledata, and it's only temporary. What needs to happen is I need a way to run something like a "mini libco thread" inside of the main thread, so that the object renderer can run in parallel with the rest of the PPU, yet not be a hideous abomination of a state machine, yet also not be horrendously slow as a full libco thread would be. I'm envisioning some kind of stackless yielding coroutine. But I'll need to think through how to design that, given the absence of coroutines even in C++17.
2017-06-04 03:16:44 +00:00
io.hblank = 0;
if(io.vcounter < 160) cpu.dmaHDMA();
step(32);
Update to v102r19 release. byuu says: Note: add `#undef OUT` to the top of higan/gba/ppu/ppu.hpp to compile on Windows (ugh ...) Now to await posts about this in four more threads again ;) Changelog: - GBA: rewrote PPU from a scanline-based renderer to a pixel-based renderer - ruby: fixed video/gdi bugs Note that there's an approximately 21% speed penalty compared to v102r18 for the pixel-based renderer. Also, horizontal mosaic effects are not yet implemented. But they should be prior to v103. This one is a little tricky as it currently works on fully rendered scanlines. I need to roll the mosaic into the background renderers, and then for sprites, well ... see below. The trickiest part by far of this new renderer is the object (sprite) system. Unlike every other system I emulate, the GBA supports affine rendering of its sprites. Or in other words, rotation effects. And it also has a very complex priority system. Right now, I can't see any way that the GBA PPU could render pixels in real-time like this. My belief is that there's a 240-entry buffer that fills up the next scanline's row of pixels. Which means it probably also runs on the last scanline of Vblank so that the first scanline has sprite data. However, I didn't design my object renderer like this just yet. For now, it creates a buffer of all 240 pixels right away at the start of the scanline. I know\!\! That's technically scanline-based. But it's only for fetching object tiledata, and it's only temporary. What needs to happen is I need a way to run something like a "mini libco thread" inside of the main thread, so that the object renderer can run in parallel with the rest of the PPU, yet not be a hideous abomination of a state machine, yet also not be horrendously slow as a full libco thread would be. I'm envisioning some kind of stackless yielding coroutine. But I'll need to think through how to design that, given the absence of coroutines even in C++17.
2017-06-04 03:16:44 +00:00
if(++io.vcounter == 228) io.vcounter = 0;
}
auto PPU::frame() -> void {
player.frame();
scheduler.exit(Scheduler::Event::Frame);
}
Update to v098r06 release. byuu says: Changelog: - emulation cores now refresh video from host thread instead of cothreads (fix AMD crash) - SFC: fixed another bug with leap year months in SharpRTC emulation - SFC: cleaned up camelCase on function names for armdsp,epsonrtc,hitachidsp,mcc,nss,sharprtc classes - GB: added MBC1M emulation (requires manually setting mapper=MBC1M in manifest.bml for now, sorry) - audio: implemented Emulator::Audio mixer and effects processor - audio: implemented Emulator::Stream interface - it is now possible to have more than two audio streams: eg SNES + SGB + MSU1 + Voicer-Kun (eventually) - audio: added reverb delay + reverb level settings; exposed balance configuration in UI - video: reworked palette generation to re-enable saturation, gamma, luminance adjustments - higan/emulator.cpp is gone since there was nothing left in it I know you guys are going to say the color adjust/balance/reverb stuff is pointless. And indeed it mostly is. But I like the idea of allowing some fun special effects and configurability that isn't system-wide. Note: there seems to be some kind of added audio lag in the SGB emulation now, and I don't really understand why. The code should be effectively identical to what I had before. The only main thing is that I'm sampling things to 48000hz instead of 32040hz before mixing. There's no point where I'm intentionally introducing added latency though. I'm kind of stumped, so if anyone wouldn't mind taking a look at it, it'd be much appreciated :/ I don't have an MSU1 test ROM, but the latency issue may affect MSU1 as well, and that would be very bad.
2016-04-22 13:35:51 +00:00
auto PPU::refresh() -> void {
Emulator::video.refresh(output, 240 * sizeof(uint32), 240, 160);
}
Update to v102r19 release. byuu says: Note: add `#undef OUT` to the top of higan/gba/ppu/ppu.hpp to compile on Windows (ugh ...) Now to await posts about this in four more threads again ;) Changelog: - GBA: rewrote PPU from a scanline-based renderer to a pixel-based renderer - ruby: fixed video/gdi bugs Note that there's an approximately 21% speed penalty compared to v102r18 for the pixel-based renderer. Also, horizontal mosaic effects are not yet implemented. But they should be prior to v103. This one is a little tricky as it currently works on fully rendered scanlines. I need to roll the mosaic into the background renderers, and then for sprites, well ... see below. The trickiest part by far of this new renderer is the object (sprite) system. Unlike every other system I emulate, the GBA supports affine rendering of its sprites. Or in other words, rotation effects. And it also has a very complex priority system. Right now, I can't see any way that the GBA PPU could render pixels in real-time like this. My belief is that there's a 240-entry buffer that fills up the next scanline's row of pixels. Which means it probably also runs on the last scanline of Vblank so that the first scanline has sprite data. However, I didn't design my object renderer like this just yet. For now, it creates a buffer of all 240 pixels right away at the start of the scanline. I know\!\! That's technically scanline-based. But it's only for fetching object tiledata, and it's only temporary. What needs to happen is I need a way to run something like a "mini libco thread" inside of the main thread, so that the object renderer can run in parallel with the rest of the PPU, yet not be a hideous abomination of a state machine, yet also not be horrendously slow as a full libco thread would be. I'm envisioning some kind of stackless yielding coroutine. But I'll need to think through how to design that, given the absence of coroutines even in C++17.
2017-06-04 03:16:44 +00:00
auto PPU::power() -> void {
create(PPU::Enter, 16'777'216);
for(uint n = 0x000; n <= 0x055; n++) bus.io[n] = this;
for(uint n = 0; n < 240 * 160; n++) output[n] = 0;
for(uint n = 0; n < 96 * 1024; n++) vram[n] = 0x00;
Update to v102r19 release. byuu says: Note: add `#undef OUT` to the top of higan/gba/ppu/ppu.hpp to compile on Windows (ugh ...) Now to await posts about this in four more threads again ;) Changelog: - GBA: rewrote PPU from a scanline-based renderer to a pixel-based renderer - ruby: fixed video/gdi bugs Note that there's an approximately 21% speed penalty compared to v102r18 for the pixel-based renderer. Also, horizontal mosaic effects are not yet implemented. But they should be prior to v103. This one is a little tricky as it currently works on fully rendered scanlines. I need to roll the mosaic into the background renderers, and then for sprites, well ... see below. The trickiest part by far of this new renderer is the object (sprite) system. Unlike every other system I emulate, the GBA supports affine rendering of its sprites. Or in other words, rotation effects. And it also has a very complex priority system. Right now, I can't see any way that the GBA PPU could render pixels in real-time like this. My belief is that there's a 240-entry buffer that fills up the next scanline's row of pixels. Which means it probably also runs on the last scanline of Vblank so that the first scanline has sprite data. However, I didn't design my object renderer like this just yet. For now, it creates a buffer of all 240 pixels right away at the start of the scanline. I know\!\! That's technically scanline-based. But it's only for fetching object tiledata, and it's only temporary. What needs to happen is I need a way to run something like a "mini libco thread" inside of the main thread, so that the object renderer can run in parallel with the rest of the PPU, yet not be a hideous abomination of a state machine, yet also not be horrendously slow as a full libco thread would be. I'm envisioning some kind of stackless yielding coroutine. But I'll need to think through how to design that, given the absence of coroutines even in C++17.
2017-06-04 03:16:44 +00:00
for(uint n = 0; n < 1024; n += 2) writePRAM(n, Half, 0x0000);
for(uint n = 0; n < 1024; n += 2) writeOAM(n, Half, 0x0000);
memory::fill(&io, sizeof(IO));
for(auto& object : this->object) object = {};
for(auto& param : this->objectParam) param = {};
Update to v102r19 release. byuu says: Note: add `#undef OUT` to the top of higan/gba/ppu/ppu.hpp to compile on Windows (ugh ...) Now to await posts about this in four more threads again ;) Changelog: - GBA: rewrote PPU from a scanline-based renderer to a pixel-based renderer - ruby: fixed video/gdi bugs Note that there's an approximately 21% speed penalty compared to v102r18 for the pixel-based renderer. Also, horizontal mosaic effects are not yet implemented. But they should be prior to v103. This one is a little tricky as it currently works on fully rendered scanlines. I need to roll the mosaic into the background renderers, and then for sprites, well ... see below. The trickiest part by far of this new renderer is the object (sprite) system. Unlike every other system I emulate, the GBA supports affine rendering of its sprites. Or in other words, rotation effects. And it also has a very complex priority system. Right now, I can't see any way that the GBA PPU could render pixels in real-time like this. My belief is that there's a 240-entry buffer that fills up the next scanline's row of pixels. Which means it probably also runs on the last scanline of Vblank so that the first scanline has sprite data. However, I didn't design my object renderer like this just yet. For now, it creates a buffer of all 240 pixels right away at the start of the scanline. I know\!\! That's technically scanline-based. But it's only for fetching object tiledata, and it's only temporary. What needs to happen is I need a way to run something like a "mini libco thread" inside of the main thread, so that the object renderer can run in parallel with the rest of the PPU, yet not be a hideous abomination of a state machine, yet also not be horrendously slow as a full libco thread would be. I'm envisioning some kind of stackless yielding coroutine. But I'll need to think through how to design that, given the absence of coroutines even in C++17.
2017-06-04 03:16:44 +00:00
bg0.power(BG0);
bg1.power(BG1);
bg2.power(BG2);
bg3.power(BG3);
objects.power();
Update to v102r19 release. byuu says: Note: add `#undef OUT` to the top of higan/gba/ppu/ppu.hpp to compile on Windows (ugh ...) Now to await posts about this in four more threads again ;) Changelog: - GBA: rewrote PPU from a scanline-based renderer to a pixel-based renderer - ruby: fixed video/gdi bugs Note that there's an approximately 21% speed penalty compared to v102r18 for the pixel-based renderer. Also, horizontal mosaic effects are not yet implemented. But they should be prior to v103. This one is a little tricky as it currently works on fully rendered scanlines. I need to roll the mosaic into the background renderers, and then for sprites, well ... see below. The trickiest part by far of this new renderer is the object (sprite) system. Unlike every other system I emulate, the GBA supports affine rendering of its sprites. Or in other words, rotation effects. And it also has a very complex priority system. Right now, I can't see any way that the GBA PPU could render pixels in real-time like this. My belief is that there's a 240-entry buffer that fills up the next scanline's row of pixels. Which means it probably also runs on the last scanline of Vblank so that the first scanline has sprite data. However, I didn't design my object renderer like this just yet. For now, it creates a buffer of all 240 pixels right away at the start of the scanline. I know\!\! That's technically scanline-based. But it's only for fetching object tiledata, and it's only temporary. What needs to happen is I need a way to run something like a "mini libco thread" inside of the main thread, so that the object renderer can run in parallel with the rest of the PPU, yet not be a hideous abomination of a state machine, yet also not be horrendously slow as a full libco thread would be. I'm envisioning some kind of stackless yielding coroutine. But I'll need to think through how to design that, given the absence of coroutines even in C++17.
2017-06-04 03:16:44 +00:00
window0.power(IN0);
window1.power(IN1);
window2.power(IN2);
window3.power(OUT);
screen.power();
}
}