2012-04-01 01:41:15 +00:00
|
|
|
uint8 PPU::read(uint32 addr) {
|
|
|
|
switch(addr) {
|
2012-03-31 08:14:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2012-03-31 08:17:36 +00:00
|
|
|
//DISPCNT
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000000: return regs.control >> 0;
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000001: return regs.control >> 8;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//GRSWP
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000002: return regs.greenswap;
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000003: return 0u;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//DISPSTAT
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000004: return regs.status >> 0;
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000005: return regs.status >> 8;
|
|
|
|
|
2012-03-31 08:14:31 +00:00
|
|
|
//VCOUNT
|
2012-03-31 08:17:36 +00:00
|
|
|
case 0x04000006: return regs.vcounter >> 0;
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000007: return regs.vcounter >> 8;
|
|
|
|
|
2012-04-09 06:41:27 +00:00
|
|
|
//BG0CNT,BG1CNT,BG2CNT,BG3CNT
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000008: case 0x04000009:
|
|
|
|
case 0x0400000a: case 0x0400000b:
|
|
|
|
case 0x0400000c: case 0x0400000d:
|
|
|
|
case 0x0400000e: case 0x0400000f: {
|
2013-05-05 09:21:30 +00:00
|
|
|
auto& bg = regs.bg[(addr >> 1) & 3];
|
2012-04-09 06:41:27 +00:00
|
|
|
unsigned shift = (addr & 1) * 8;
|
|
|
|
return bg.control >> shift;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2012-03-31 08:17:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//WININ
|
Update to v087r22 release.
byuu says:
Changelog:
- fixed below pixel green channel on color blending
- added semi-transparent objects [Exophase's method]
- added full support for windows (both inputs, OBJ windows, and output, with optional color effect disable)
- EEPROM uses nall::bitarray now to be friendlier to saving memory to disk
- removed incomplete mosaic support for now (too broken, untested)
- improved sprite priority. Hopefully it's right now.
Just about everything should look great now. It took 25 days, but we
finally have the BIOS rendering correctly.
In order to do OBJ windows, I had to drop my above/below buffers
entirely. I went with the nuclear option. There's separate layers for
all BGs and objects. I build the OBJ window table during object
rendering. So as a result, after rendering I go back and apply windows
(and the object window that now exists.) After that, I have to do
a painful Z-buffer select of the top two most important pixels. Since
I now know the layers, the blending enable tests are a lot nicer, at
least. But this obviously has quite a speed hit: 390fps to 325fps for
Mr. Driller 2 title screen.
TONC says that "bad" window coordinates do really insane things. GBAtek
says it's a simple y2 < y1 || y2 > 160 ? 160 : y2; x2 < x1 || x2 > 240
? 240 : x2; I like the GBAtek version more, so I went with that. I sure
hope it's right ... but my guess is the hardware does this with
a counter that wraps around or something. Also, say you have two OBJ
mode 2 sprites that overlap each other, but with different priorities.
The lower (more important) priority sprite has a clear pixel, but the
higher priority sprite has a set pixel. Do we set the "inside OBJ
window" flag to true here? Eg does the value OR, or does it hold the
most important sprite's pixel value? Cydrak suspects it's OR-based,
I concur from what I can see.
Mosaic, I am at a loss. I really need a lot more information in order to
implement it. For backgrounds, does it apply to the Vcounter of the
entire screen? Or does it apply post-scroll? Or does it even apply after
every adjust in affine/bitmap modes? I'm betting the hcounter
background mosaic starts at the leftmost edge of the screen, and repeats
previous pixels to apply the effect. Like SNES, very simple. For
sprites, the SNES didn't have this. Does the mosaic grid start at (0,0)
of the screen, or at (0,0) of each sprite? The latter will look a lot
nicer, but be a lot more complex. Is mosaic on affine objects any
different than mosaic of linear(tiled) objects?
With that out of the way, we still have to fix the CPU memory access
timing, add the rest of the CPU penalty cycles, the memory rotation
/ alignment / extend behavior needs to be fixed, the shifter desperately
needs to be moved from loops to single shift operations, and I need to
add flash memory support.
2012-04-13 11:49:32 +00:00
|
|
|
case 0x04000048: return regs.windowflags[In0];
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000049: return regs.windowflags[In1];
|
|
|
|
case 0x0400004a: return regs.windowflags[Out];
|
|
|
|
case 0x0400004b: return regs.windowflags[Obj];
|
2012-03-31 08:17:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//BLTCNT
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000050: return regs.blend.control >> 0;
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000051: return regs.blend.control >> 8;
|
2012-03-31 08:14:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0u;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2012-04-01 01:41:15 +00:00
|
|
|
void PPU::write(uint32 addr, uint8 byte) {
|
|
|
|
switch(addr) {
|
2012-03-31 08:14:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//DISPCNT
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000000: regs.control = (regs.control & 0xff00) | (byte << 0); return;
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000001: regs.control = (regs.control & 0x00ff) | (byte << 8); return;
|
|
|
|
|
2012-03-31 08:17:36 +00:00
|
|
|
//GRSWP
|
Update to v087r22 release.
byuu says:
Changelog:
- fixed below pixel green channel on color blending
- added semi-transparent objects [Exophase's method]
- added full support for windows (both inputs, OBJ windows, and output, with optional color effect disable)
- EEPROM uses nall::bitarray now to be friendlier to saving memory to disk
- removed incomplete mosaic support for now (too broken, untested)
- improved sprite priority. Hopefully it's right now.
Just about everything should look great now. It took 25 days, but we
finally have the BIOS rendering correctly.
In order to do OBJ windows, I had to drop my above/below buffers
entirely. I went with the nuclear option. There's separate layers for
all BGs and objects. I build the OBJ window table during object
rendering. So as a result, after rendering I go back and apply windows
(and the object window that now exists.) After that, I have to do
a painful Z-buffer select of the top two most important pixels. Since
I now know the layers, the blending enable tests are a lot nicer, at
least. But this obviously has quite a speed hit: 390fps to 325fps for
Mr. Driller 2 title screen.
TONC says that "bad" window coordinates do really insane things. GBAtek
says it's a simple y2 < y1 || y2 > 160 ? 160 : y2; x2 < x1 || x2 > 240
? 240 : x2; I like the GBAtek version more, so I went with that. I sure
hope it's right ... but my guess is the hardware does this with
a counter that wraps around or something. Also, say you have two OBJ
mode 2 sprites that overlap each other, but with different priorities.
The lower (more important) priority sprite has a clear pixel, but the
higher priority sprite has a set pixel. Do we set the "inside OBJ
window" flag to true here? Eg does the value OR, or does it hold the
most important sprite's pixel value? Cydrak suspects it's OR-based,
I concur from what I can see.
Mosaic, I am at a loss. I really need a lot more information in order to
implement it. For backgrounds, does it apply to the Vcounter of the
entire screen? Or does it apply post-scroll? Or does it even apply after
every adjust in affine/bitmap modes? I'm betting the hcounter
background mosaic starts at the leftmost edge of the screen, and repeats
previous pixels to apply the effect. Like SNES, very simple. For
sprites, the SNES didn't have this. Does the mosaic grid start at (0,0)
of the screen, or at (0,0) of each sprite? The latter will look a lot
nicer, but be a lot more complex. Is mosaic on affine objects any
different than mosaic of linear(tiled) objects?
With that out of the way, we still have to fix the CPU memory access
timing, add the rest of the CPU penalty cycles, the memory rotation
/ alignment / extend behavior needs to be fixed, the shifter desperately
needs to be moved from loops to single shift operations, and I need to
add flash memory support.
2012-04-13 11:49:32 +00:00
|
|
|
case 0x04000002: regs.greenswap = byte >> 0; return;
|
2012-03-31 08:17:36 +00:00
|
|
|
case 0x04000003: return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//DISPSTAT
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000004:
|
Update to v087r22 release.
byuu says:
Changelog:
- fixed below pixel green channel on color blending
- added semi-transparent objects [Exophase's method]
- added full support for windows (both inputs, OBJ windows, and output, with optional color effect disable)
- EEPROM uses nall::bitarray now to be friendlier to saving memory to disk
- removed incomplete mosaic support for now (too broken, untested)
- improved sprite priority. Hopefully it's right now.
Just about everything should look great now. It took 25 days, but we
finally have the BIOS rendering correctly.
In order to do OBJ windows, I had to drop my above/below buffers
entirely. I went with the nuclear option. There's separate layers for
all BGs and objects. I build the OBJ window table during object
rendering. So as a result, after rendering I go back and apply windows
(and the object window that now exists.) After that, I have to do
a painful Z-buffer select of the top two most important pixels. Since
I now know the layers, the blending enable tests are a lot nicer, at
least. But this obviously has quite a speed hit: 390fps to 325fps for
Mr. Driller 2 title screen.
TONC says that "bad" window coordinates do really insane things. GBAtek
says it's a simple y2 < y1 || y2 > 160 ? 160 : y2; x2 < x1 || x2 > 240
? 240 : x2; I like the GBAtek version more, so I went with that. I sure
hope it's right ... but my guess is the hardware does this with
a counter that wraps around or something. Also, say you have two OBJ
mode 2 sprites that overlap each other, but with different priorities.
The lower (more important) priority sprite has a clear pixel, but the
higher priority sprite has a set pixel. Do we set the "inside OBJ
window" flag to true here? Eg does the value OR, or does it hold the
most important sprite's pixel value? Cydrak suspects it's OR-based,
I concur from what I can see.
Mosaic, I am at a loss. I really need a lot more information in order to
implement it. For backgrounds, does it apply to the Vcounter of the
entire screen? Or does it apply post-scroll? Or does it even apply after
every adjust in affine/bitmap modes? I'm betting the hcounter
background mosaic starts at the leftmost edge of the screen, and repeats
previous pixels to apply the effect. Like SNES, very simple. For
sprites, the SNES didn't have this. Does the mosaic grid start at (0,0)
of the screen, or at (0,0) of each sprite? The latter will look a lot
nicer, but be a lot more complex. Is mosaic on affine objects any
different than mosaic of linear(tiled) objects?
With that out of the way, we still have to fix the CPU memory access
timing, add the rest of the CPU penalty cycles, the memory rotation
/ alignment / extend behavior needs to be fixed, the shifter desperately
needs to be moved from loops to single shift operations, and I need to
add flash memory support.
2012-04-13 11:49:32 +00:00
|
|
|
regs.status.irqvblank = byte >> 3;
|
|
|
|
regs.status.irqhblank = byte >> 4;
|
|
|
|
regs.status.irqvcoincidence = byte >> 5;
|
2012-03-31 08:17:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000005:
|
2012-04-09 06:19:32 +00:00
|
|
|
regs.status.vcompare = byte;
|
2012-03-31 08:17:36 +00:00
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
2012-04-09 06:41:27 +00:00
|
|
|
//BG0CNT,BG1CNT,BG2CNT,BG3CNT
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000008: case 0x04000009:
|
|
|
|
case 0x0400000a: case 0x0400000b:
|
|
|
|
case 0x0400000c: case 0x0400000d:
|
|
|
|
case 0x0400000e: case 0x0400000f: {
|
2013-05-05 09:21:30 +00:00
|
|
|
auto& bg = regs.bg[(addr >> 1) & 3];
|
2012-04-09 06:41:27 +00:00
|
|
|
unsigned shift = (addr & 1) * 8;
|
|
|
|
bg.control = (bg.control & ~(255 << shift)) | (byte << shift);
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2012-03-31 08:17:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2012-04-09 06:41:27 +00:00
|
|
|
//BG0HOFS,BG1HOFS,BG2BOFS,BG3HOFS
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000010: case 0x04000011:
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000014: case 0x04000015:
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000018: case 0x04000019:
|
|
|
|
case 0x0400001c: case 0x0400001d: {
|
2013-05-05 09:21:30 +00:00
|
|
|
auto& bg = regs.bg[(addr >> 2) & 3];
|
2012-04-09 06:41:27 +00:00
|
|
|
unsigned shift = (addr & 1) * 8;
|
|
|
|
bg.hoffset = (bg.hoffset & ~(255 << shift)) | (byte << shift);
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2012-03-31 08:17:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2012-04-09 06:41:27 +00:00
|
|
|
//BG0VOFS,BG1VOFS,BG2VOFS,BG3VOFS
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000012: case 0x04000013:
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000016: case 0x04000017:
|
|
|
|
case 0x0400001a: case 0x0400001b:
|
|
|
|
case 0x0400001e: case 0x0400001f: {
|
2013-05-05 09:21:30 +00:00
|
|
|
auto& bg = regs.bg[(addr >> 2) & 3];
|
2012-04-09 06:41:27 +00:00
|
|
|
unsigned shift = (addr & 1) * 8;
|
|
|
|
bg.voffset = (bg.voffset & ~(255 << shift)) | (byte << shift);
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2012-03-31 08:17:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2012-04-09 06:41:27 +00:00
|
|
|
//BG2PA,BG3PA
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000020: case 0x04000021:
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000030: case 0x04000031: {
|
2013-05-05 09:21:30 +00:00
|
|
|
auto& bg = regs.bg[(addr >> 4) & 3];
|
2012-04-09 06:41:27 +00:00
|
|
|
unsigned shift = (addr & 1) * 8;
|
|
|
|
bg.pa = (bg.pa & ~(255 << shift)) | (byte << shift);
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2012-03-31 08:17:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2012-04-09 06:41:27 +00:00
|
|
|
//BG2PB,BG3PB
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000022: case 0x04000023:
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000032: case 0x04000033: {
|
2013-05-05 09:21:30 +00:00
|
|
|
auto& bg = regs.bg[(addr >> 4) & 3];
|
2012-04-09 06:41:27 +00:00
|
|
|
unsigned shift = (addr & 1) * 8;
|
|
|
|
bg.pb = (bg.pb & ~(255 << shift)) | (byte << shift);
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2012-03-31 08:17:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2012-04-09 06:41:27 +00:00
|
|
|
//BG2PC,BG3PC
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000024: case 0x04000025:
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000034: case 0x04000035: {
|
2013-05-05 09:21:30 +00:00
|
|
|
auto& bg = regs.bg[(addr >> 4) & 3];
|
2012-04-09 06:41:27 +00:00
|
|
|
unsigned shift = (addr & 1) * 8;
|
|
|
|
bg.pc = (bg.pc & ~(255 << shift)) | (byte << shift);
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2012-03-31 08:17:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2012-04-09 06:41:27 +00:00
|
|
|
//BG2PD,BG3PD
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000026: case 0x04000027:
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000036: case 0x04000037: {
|
2013-05-05 09:21:30 +00:00
|
|
|
auto& bg = regs.bg[(addr >> 4) & 3];
|
2012-04-09 06:41:27 +00:00
|
|
|
unsigned shift = (addr & 1) * 8;
|
|
|
|
bg.pd = (bg.pd & ~(255 << shift)) | (byte << shift);
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2012-03-31 08:17:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2012-04-09 06:41:27 +00:00
|
|
|
//BG2X_L,BG2X_H,BG3X_L,BG3X_H
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000028: case 0x04000029: case 0x0400002a: case 0x0400002b:
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000038: case 0x04000039: case 0x0400003a: case 0x0400003b: {
|
2013-05-05 09:21:30 +00:00
|
|
|
auto& bg = regs.bg[(addr >> 4) & 3];
|
2012-04-09 06:41:27 +00:00
|
|
|
unsigned shift = (addr & 3) * 8;
|
|
|
|
bg.lx = bg.x = (bg.x & ~(255 << shift)) | (byte << shift);
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2012-03-31 08:17:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2012-04-09 06:41:27 +00:00
|
|
|
//BG2Y_L,BG2Y_H,BG3Y_L,BG3Y_H
|
|
|
|
case 0x0400002c: case 0x0400002d: case 0x0400002e: case 0x0400002f:
|
|
|
|
case 0x0400003c: case 0x0400003d: case 0x0400003e: case 0x0400003f: {
|
2013-05-05 09:21:30 +00:00
|
|
|
auto& bg = regs.bg[(addr >> 4) & 3];
|
2012-04-09 06:41:27 +00:00
|
|
|
unsigned shift = (addr & 3) * 8;
|
|
|
|
bg.ly = bg.y = (bg.y & ~(255 << shift)) | (byte << shift);
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2012-03-31 08:17:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//WIN0H
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000040: regs.window[0].x2 = byte; return;
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000041: regs.window[0].x1 = byte; return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//WIN1H
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000042: regs.window[1].x2 = byte; return;
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000043: regs.window[1].x1 = byte; return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//WIN0V
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000044: regs.window[0].y2 = byte; return;
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000045: regs.window[0].y1 = byte; return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//WIN1V
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000046: regs.window[1].y2 = byte; return;
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000047: regs.window[1].y1 = byte; return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//WININ
|
Update to v087r22 release.
byuu says:
Changelog:
- fixed below pixel green channel on color blending
- added semi-transparent objects [Exophase's method]
- added full support for windows (both inputs, OBJ windows, and output, with optional color effect disable)
- EEPROM uses nall::bitarray now to be friendlier to saving memory to disk
- removed incomplete mosaic support for now (too broken, untested)
- improved sprite priority. Hopefully it's right now.
Just about everything should look great now. It took 25 days, but we
finally have the BIOS rendering correctly.
In order to do OBJ windows, I had to drop my above/below buffers
entirely. I went with the nuclear option. There's separate layers for
all BGs and objects. I build the OBJ window table during object
rendering. So as a result, after rendering I go back and apply windows
(and the object window that now exists.) After that, I have to do
a painful Z-buffer select of the top two most important pixels. Since
I now know the layers, the blending enable tests are a lot nicer, at
least. But this obviously has quite a speed hit: 390fps to 325fps for
Mr. Driller 2 title screen.
TONC says that "bad" window coordinates do really insane things. GBAtek
says it's a simple y2 < y1 || y2 > 160 ? 160 : y2; x2 < x1 || x2 > 240
? 240 : x2; I like the GBAtek version more, so I went with that. I sure
hope it's right ... but my guess is the hardware does this with
a counter that wraps around or something. Also, say you have two OBJ
mode 2 sprites that overlap each other, but with different priorities.
The lower (more important) priority sprite has a clear pixel, but the
higher priority sprite has a set pixel. Do we set the "inside OBJ
window" flag to true here? Eg does the value OR, or does it hold the
most important sprite's pixel value? Cydrak suspects it's OR-based,
I concur from what I can see.
Mosaic, I am at a loss. I really need a lot more information in order to
implement it. For backgrounds, does it apply to the Vcounter of the
entire screen? Or does it apply post-scroll? Or does it even apply after
every adjust in affine/bitmap modes? I'm betting the hcounter
background mosaic starts at the leftmost edge of the screen, and repeats
previous pixels to apply the effect. Like SNES, very simple. For
sprites, the SNES didn't have this. Does the mosaic grid start at (0,0)
of the screen, or at (0,0) of each sprite? The latter will look a lot
nicer, but be a lot more complex. Is mosaic on affine objects any
different than mosaic of linear(tiled) objects?
With that out of the way, we still have to fix the CPU memory access
timing, add the rest of the CPU penalty cycles, the memory rotation
/ alignment / extend behavior needs to be fixed, the shifter desperately
needs to be moved from loops to single shift operations, and I need to
add flash memory support.
2012-04-13 11:49:32 +00:00
|
|
|
case 0x04000048: regs.windowflags[In0] = byte; return;
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000049: regs.windowflags[In1] = byte; return;
|
2012-03-31 08:17:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//WINOUT
|
Update to v087r22 release.
byuu says:
Changelog:
- fixed below pixel green channel on color blending
- added semi-transparent objects [Exophase's method]
- added full support for windows (both inputs, OBJ windows, and output, with optional color effect disable)
- EEPROM uses nall::bitarray now to be friendlier to saving memory to disk
- removed incomplete mosaic support for now (too broken, untested)
- improved sprite priority. Hopefully it's right now.
Just about everything should look great now. It took 25 days, but we
finally have the BIOS rendering correctly.
In order to do OBJ windows, I had to drop my above/below buffers
entirely. I went with the nuclear option. There's separate layers for
all BGs and objects. I build the OBJ window table during object
rendering. So as a result, after rendering I go back and apply windows
(and the object window that now exists.) After that, I have to do
a painful Z-buffer select of the top two most important pixels. Since
I now know the layers, the blending enable tests are a lot nicer, at
least. But this obviously has quite a speed hit: 390fps to 325fps for
Mr. Driller 2 title screen.
TONC says that "bad" window coordinates do really insane things. GBAtek
says it's a simple y2 < y1 || y2 > 160 ? 160 : y2; x2 < x1 || x2 > 240
? 240 : x2; I like the GBAtek version more, so I went with that. I sure
hope it's right ... but my guess is the hardware does this with
a counter that wraps around or something. Also, say you have two OBJ
mode 2 sprites that overlap each other, but with different priorities.
The lower (more important) priority sprite has a clear pixel, but the
higher priority sprite has a set pixel. Do we set the "inside OBJ
window" flag to true here? Eg does the value OR, or does it hold the
most important sprite's pixel value? Cydrak suspects it's OR-based,
I concur from what I can see.
Mosaic, I am at a loss. I really need a lot more information in order to
implement it. For backgrounds, does it apply to the Vcounter of the
entire screen? Or does it apply post-scroll? Or does it even apply after
every adjust in affine/bitmap modes? I'm betting the hcounter
background mosaic starts at the leftmost edge of the screen, and repeats
previous pixels to apply the effect. Like SNES, very simple. For
sprites, the SNES didn't have this. Does the mosaic grid start at (0,0)
of the screen, or at (0,0) of each sprite? The latter will look a lot
nicer, but be a lot more complex. Is mosaic on affine objects any
different than mosaic of linear(tiled) objects?
With that out of the way, we still have to fix the CPU memory access
timing, add the rest of the CPU penalty cycles, the memory rotation
/ alignment / extend behavior needs to be fixed, the shifter desperately
needs to be moved from loops to single shift operations, and I need to
add flash memory support.
2012-04-13 11:49:32 +00:00
|
|
|
case 0x0400004a: regs.windowflags[Out] = byte; return;
|
|
|
|
case 0x0400004b: regs.windowflags[Obj] = byte; return;
|
2012-03-31 08:17:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//MOSAIC
|
|
|
|
case 0x0400004c:
|
|
|
|
regs.mosaic.bghsize = byte >> 0;
|
|
|
|
regs.mosaic.bgvsize = byte >> 4;
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
case 0x0400004d:
|
|
|
|
regs.mosaic.objhsize = byte >> 0;
|
|
|
|
regs.mosaic.objvsize = byte >> 4;
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//BLDCNT
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000050: regs.blend.control = (regs.blend.control & 0xff00) | (byte << 0); return;
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000051: regs.blend.control = (regs.blend.control & 0x00ff) | (byte << 8); return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//BLDALPHA
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000052: regs.blend.eva = std::min(16, byte & 0x1f); return;
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000053: regs.blend.evb = std::min(16, byte & 0x1f); return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//BLDY
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000054: regs.blend.evy = std::min(16, byte & 0x1f); return;
|
|
|
|
case 0x04000055: return;
|
|
|
|
|
2012-03-31 08:14:31 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|