mirror of https://github.com/LIJI32/SameBoy.git
More accurate sample repeat glitch, fixes #483
This commit is contained in:
parent
95773b9538
commit
9bf7e0b4df
21
Core/apu.c
21
Core/apu.c
|
@ -1111,19 +1111,6 @@ void GB_apu_write(GB_gameboy_t *gb, uint8_t reg, uint8_t value)
|
|||
case GB_IO_NR13:
|
||||
case GB_IO_NR23: {
|
||||
unsigned index = reg == GB_IO_NR23? GB_SQUARE_2: GB_SQUARE_1;
|
||||
if (gb->apu.is_active[index]) {
|
||||
/* On an AGB, as well as on CGB C and earlier (TODO: Tested: 0, B and C), it behaves slightly different on
|
||||
double speed. */
|
||||
if (gb->model == GB_MODEL_CGB_E || gb->model == GB_MODEL_CGB_D || gb->apu.square_channels[index].sample_countdown & 1) {
|
||||
if (gb->apu.square_channels[index].did_tick &&
|
||||
gb->apu.square_channels[index].sample_countdown >> 1 == (gb->apu.square_channels[index].sample_length ^ 0x7FF)) {
|
||||
gb->apu.square_channels[index].current_sample_index--;
|
||||
gb->apu.square_channels[index].current_sample_index &= 7;
|
||||
gb->apu.square_channels[index].sample_surpressed = false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
gb->apu.square_channels[index].sample_length &= ~0xFF;
|
||||
gb->apu.square_channels[index].sample_length |= value & 0xFF;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
@ -1133,10 +1120,10 @@ void GB_apu_write(GB_gameboy_t *gb, uint8_t reg, uint8_t value)
|
|||
case GB_IO_NR24: {
|
||||
unsigned index = reg == GB_IO_NR24? GB_SQUARE_2: GB_SQUARE_1;
|
||||
bool was_active = gb->apu.is_active[index];
|
||||
/* TODO: When the sample length changes right before being updated, the countdown should change to the
|
||||
old length, but the current sample should not change. Because our write timing isn't accurate to
|
||||
the T-cycle, we hack around it by stepping the sample index backwards. */
|
||||
if ((value & 0x80) == 0 && gb->apu.is_active[index]) {
|
||||
/* TODO: When the sample length changes right before being updated from ≥$700 to <$700, the countdown
|
||||
should change to the old length, but the current sample should not change. Because our write
|
||||
timing isn't accurate to the T-cycle, we hack around it by stepping the sample index backwards. */
|
||||
if ((value & 0x80) == 0 && gb->apu.is_active[index] && (gb->io_registers[reg] & 0x7) == 7 && (value & 7) != 7) {
|
||||
/* On an AGB, as well as on CGB C and earlier (TODO: Tested: 0, B and C), it behaves slightly different on
|
||||
double speed. */
|
||||
if (gb->model == GB_MODEL_CGB_E || gb->model == GB_MODEL_CGB_D || gb->apu.square_channels[index].sample_countdown & 1) {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue