Squashed commit of the following:
commit 6e1fea3b16bb330ed2862eb00d2e911221c48a34
Author: radius <andres.430@gmail.com>
Date: Sat Nov 18 22:16:02 2017 -0500
use the baked in address instead of sockaddr
commit 84f2d389fd6352b3037f48c18d133d2f1063d461
Author: radius <andres.430@gmail.com>
Date: Sat Nov 18 22:05:57 2017 -0500
send replies
commit c6733009cc5a25e58391c5fc693b277ea27404b3
Author: radius <andres.430@gmail.com>
Date: Sat Nov 18 21:53:12 2017 -0500
send replies
commit a6816c9481f7ea89a3c97597233e54c6354716e7
Author: radius <andres.430@gmail.com>
Date: Sat Nov 18 21:46:55 2017 -0500
send replies
commit c2453b73ccafbd53192507affbc11d5f279c2e7c
Author: radius <andres.430@gmail.com>
Date: Sat Nov 18 21:26:34 2017 -0500
look for common interfaces
commit fb42e6470242689f5e6160149ef91f0f0abf068d
Author: radius <andres.430@gmail.com>
Date: Sat Nov 18 20:06:50 2017 -0500
send broadcasts in all interfaces
commit b7730596df9775fb815007689e9c7cc06b317b03
Author: radius <andres.430@gmail.com>
Date: Sat Nov 18 20:00:17 2017 -0500
send broadcasts in all interfaces
commit b620a78052d1b95e81d346f3e5efb233e0547793
Author: radius <andres.430@gmail.com>
Date: Sat Nov 18 14:30:31 2017 -0500
add more logging
commit c016c7d559cd631172a58f99cd3e1a1365965b8e
Author: radius <andres.430@gmail.com>
Date: Sat Nov 18 14:12:03 2017 -0500
update log messages
commit 0a49ba61f56f2ca483fa76c7a04f0709c68b95ad
Author: radius <andres.430@gmail.com>
Date: Sat Nov 18 13:50:47 2017 -0500
fix lan room listing for rooms > 1, allow connecting in arbitrary ports
Previously, if two clients were connected to the same server and one of
them was ahead of the server, the only way to rectify that situation was
for the client to get so far ahead that it stalled, as the server could
only catch up with an ahead client if all clients were ahead. That's
unrealistic. This gives the server the alternate option of demanding
that a client stall. This keeps things nicely in line even with >2
players.
I had previously assumed that if AF_INET6 is defined, IPv6 support was
present. Some psychopathic console SDKs which shall not be named
actually define AF_INET6 but none of the IPv6 structures. As there is
therefore no way to determine whether IPv6 support is present at
preprocessor time, I'm ust assuming that HAVE_SOCKET_LEGACY implies no
IPv6. This means in effect that no consoles get IPv6 support.
Silence some Coverity warnings (including a real memory leak) and be
more careful about checking IPv6 mode (for backwards compatibility with
systems that don't support IPv6 but may run code compiled to expect IPv6)
twinaphex