From 51e2da2cbd9e377c977e3c57a5fe9def25328c0e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: twinaphex <libretro@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 13:21:08 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Revert this back - reintroduce the leak but should hopefully
 solve issues on newer Intel CPUs

---
 libretro-common/rthreads/rthreads.c | 3 +--
 runloop.c                           | 1 -
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libretro-common/rthreads/rthreads.c b/libretro-common/rthreads/rthreads.c
index 3057e119d8..deef2f8d2e 100644
--- a/libretro-common/rthreads/rthreads.c
+++ b/libretro-common/rthreads/rthreads.c
@@ -99,8 +99,7 @@ static void *thread_wrap(void *data_)
    struct thread_data *data = (struct thread_data*)data_;
    if (!data)
 	   return 0;
-   if (data->func)
-      data->func(data->userdata);
+   data->func(data->userdata);
    free(data);
    return 0;
 }
diff --git a/runloop.c b/runloop.c
index 5b7782de32..7ee5ee22a2 100644
--- a/runloop.c
+++ b/runloop.c
@@ -1051,7 +1051,6 @@ bool runloop_ctl(enum runloop_ctl_state state, void *data)
 #ifdef HAVE_THREADS
             threaded_enable = settings->threaded_data_runloop_enable;
 #endif
-            task_queue_ctl(TASK_QUEUE_CTL_DEINIT, NULL);
             task_queue_ctl(TASK_QUEUE_CTL_INIT, &threaded_enable);
          }
          break;