From 23dc89168a56aae28630f91fa7055f0c5b4a1fe6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alcaro <floating@muncher.se>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 19:21:17 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] are those HAVE flags not set up there or something?

---
 gfx/drivers_context/sdl_gl_ctx.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gfx/drivers_context/sdl_gl_ctx.c b/gfx/drivers_context/sdl_gl_ctx.c
index 457a5a6fdd..199e239db4 100644
--- a/gfx/drivers_context/sdl_gl_ctx.c
+++ b/gfx/drivers_context/sdl_gl_ctx.c
@@ -15,15 +15,16 @@
  */
 
 #include "SDL.h"
-#ifdef HAVE_X11
-#include <X11/Xlib.h>
-#endif
 
 #include "../../configuration.h"
 #include "../../driver.h"
 #include "../../runloop.h"
 #include "../common/gl_common.h"
 
+#ifdef HAVE_X11
+#include <X11/Xlib.h>
+#endif
+
 static enum gfx_ctx_api sdl_api = GFX_CTX_OPENGL_API;
 static unsigned       g_major = 2;
 static unsigned       g_minor = 1;