From 1cbc8471335bc98605a6430e8eed1ff742bc07a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: twinaphex <libretro@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 05:53:47 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] In case we return false here, we should still unlock the
 mutex first

---
 runloop.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/runloop.c b/runloop.c
index 11c0e1ae5a..69cb92698d 100644
--- a/runloop.c
+++ b/runloop.c
@@ -501,7 +501,12 @@ bool runloop_ctl(enum runloop_ctl_state state, void *data)
          {
             const char **ret = (const char**)data;
             if (!ret)
+            {
+#ifdef HAVE_THREADS
+               slock_unlock(_runloop_msg_queue_lock);
+#endif
                return false;
+            }
             *ret = msg_queue_pull(runloop_msg_queue);
          }
 #ifdef HAVE_THREADS