BizHawk/BizHawk.Emulation/Consoles/GB/Graphics.cs

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;

namespace BizHawk.Emulation.Consoles.GB
{
	public partial class GB
	{
		private byte[] OAM = new byte[1];
		private byte[] VRAM = new byte[1];
	}
}
-												-As I'm not going to know what I'm doing if I keep hacking away at zeromus' old core blindly, I'm writing a new one.
--It's going to be based heavily based on Imran Nazar's "GameBoy Emulation in Javascript" series. I figure it's better that I learn by emulation (Har har) instead of spending more time reading references than programming.
--Finished the memory management (Part 2).
--adelikat:
---Do I implement the required functions for IEmulator and IVideoProvider now, do it later, or is this something you or zeromus would do (Like for the API)?
---At what point should we have the emulator actually use this core instead of zeromus'? As terrible as he says his is, this one doesn't do anything yet. Still, I need some mechanism of testing it.
											
										
										
											2012-05-27 04:06:48 +00:00
+								using System;
 								using System.Collections.Generic;
 								using System.Linq;
 								using System.Text;
 								namespace BizHawk.Emulation.Consoles.GB
 								{
 									public partial class GB
 									{
-												get rid of some warnings
											
										
										
											2012-06-15 19:21:46 +00:00
+										private byte[] OAM = new byte[1];
 										private byte[] VRAM = new byte[1];
-												-As I'm not going to know what I'm doing if I keep hacking away at zeromus' old core blindly, I'm writing a new one.
--It's going to be based heavily based on Imran Nazar's "GameBoy Emulation in Javascript" series. I figure it's better that I learn by emulation (Har har) instead of spending more time reading references than programming.
--Finished the memory management (Part 2).
--adelikat:
---Do I implement the required functions for IEmulator and IVideoProvider now, do it later, or is this something you or zeromus would do (Like for the API)?
---At what point should we have the emulator actually use this core instead of zeromus'? As terrible as he says his is, this one doesn't do anything yet. Still, I need some mechanism of testing it.
											
										
										
											2012-05-27 04:06:48 +00:00
+									}
 								}